Happening Today: Monday, December 1st

Sunday

Tom Trento of WatchObsession.com will be doing some radio appearances (if you click on the image at right, you'll get a larger picture):

8:35am EST (Eastern Standard Time) — The ManCow Show (www.mancow.com) check site to find your local station or listen live...ONLINE!

TOPIC'S — Sharia Law Threatens America...and Europe! Going on offense against the Jihadists.

Tom will be interviewed by — Mancow, one of America's loudest and most aggressive proponents of our cherished First Amendment!

1pm EST — USA Radio Network (www.usaradio.com) — check site to find your local station or listen live...ONLINE!

TOPICS — Sharia Law, Stealth Jihad, Obsession, Radical Islam's War Against the West

Tom will be interviewed by John Clemens.

9pm EST — Plains Radio Network (www.plainsradio.com) — check site to find your local station or listen live...ONLINE!

Tom will be interviewed by Caren and Ed Hale on their show, The Lion's Den.

TOPICS — Sharia law, Stealth Jihad in America, impact of 28 million Obsessions, Going on offense against the Jihadists.


TOM TRENTO'S THOUGHTS:

My thinking is very simple. A good offense is a great defense.

On Saturday, November 22, in a debate with an Imam, I presented a document that challenged Muslims to get past their "stealth vocabulary," and answer questions indicating the degree to which they are willing to assimilate into American life, culture and law. It was clear that this document (Please Help Us) had the unique consequent of shifting the argument from me being on defense to me being on offense. This is a very significant development. (Request a copy from me, Tom, and I will send it.)

On Sunday, November 23, Dave Gaubatz of the Mapping Sharia Project, in a show of amazing courage, walked into the 14th Annual CAIR dinner and served CAIR's Executive Director, Nihad Awad with a summons. Let's just say Mr. Awad has had better evenings at Burger King! See story here.

On Monday November 24, the Holy Land Defendants were found guilty on all counts, thus handing the Bush administration and all American's a critical legal victory in the war on terror. See story here.

In light of these and other factors, I believe that all anti-jihad organizations (and individuals) should review their 2009 plans and include as a tactical priority, the transition from any defensive posture to a full out offensive methodology. Do not waste time "proving" you are not an Islamophobe, instead challenge every Muslim leader of known "stealth" organizations, local and national, to come out in the open and discuss the Muslim Brother Project, in the public square. This was a winning strategy in the Holy Land Foundation Trial and should be the basis of our tactical strategy in 2009.

I am going to challenge to a public debate, any and all who criticized Obsession and the distribution of 28 million copies to Americans all over the United States. On many occasions I have been asked to "defend" the award-winning documentary and its massive distribution and I have gladly and successfully done just that. In 2009, I will be going after the critics, naysayers, liars and maybe even a screwball or two. This group also includes many Jewish and Christian leaders who have joined with the islamists, wittingly or unwittingly, and now are part of that group who must defend their views or simply shut-up.

In fact, just the other day I challenged the "brain-trust" of Jews On First to a series of formal debates all across America. You see, Jews On First (www.jewsonfirst.org) boast on their web site of having done a "Major Analysis: Rebutting Obsession." After getting a squishy inquiry into what I meant by "debate" (and these are journalists?) and then providing in detail what I meant, I have yet to hear from these brave folks. My guess is that they will do whatever they can to get away from my efforts to drag them into the public square before a live audience. Folks like these like to blog from the basement and not expose themselves to the real world of intellectual challenge and debate. I hope JOF can find the courage to engage, as it will be an educational experience for all.

To get the OFFENSE process rolling, in the days ahead, I will formally challenge the Executive Director of CAIR to a public debate on any criticism or complaints he has about the film I promoted all over the Unites States, Obsession, Radical Islam's War Against the West.

I know it may be a bit "mean" to go after a guy who just had a "blind Muslim" serve him on stage, but hey, anti-stealth jihad ain't beanbag!

So Mr. Nihad Awad, please have your people call my people and we can get the show on the road. If I do not hear from your folks, I will reach out and make contact in the near future. I know there will be those who advise you to ignore me...and I'll go away. But, I'm the guy that was directly involved in the promotion of Obsession and distribution at both political Conventions, so do I look like a person that will "go away?" Nah, I'll be around for a while and I will be challenging you and many of your colleagues to come in the open, in the light of day and properly and professionally debate the merits of Obsession, and all that the film contains. More importantly, I need you to help all Americans understand the criteria by which we can be convinced that this talk about the Muslim Brotherhood, CAIR, and the stealth jihad is crazy talk, having nothing to do with reality. Yes, Its time you stop worrying about the nonsensical concept of Islamophobia and start figuring out how to answer the questions I will be asking. It's time you go on DEFENSE.

Question, comments, please contact Tom.

Read more...

The Most Practical Thing You Can Do About Islam

Saturday

SINCE I STARTED Citizen Warrior, I've been trying to find things an ordinary citizen can DO that will actually help defeat the third jihad. ACT! For America (AFA) is the best thing I've found so far. They are organized and they are successfully defeating Islam's relentless encroachment in one of the most important places: In the political arena.

As it says in AFA's brochure, "ACT! for America is a nationwide organization of concerned Americans who want to be informed, who want to inform others, and who are uniting together to speak out against and resist the rising tide of Islamofascism — and the 'political correctness' that excuses it, rationalizes it, dismisses it, or blames America for it."

In a series of messages from the founder of AFA, Brigitte Gabriel, she wrote about what AFA has accomplished so far. The following are quotes from her recent letters:

Less than 14 months ago we launched ACT! for America, and we now have close to 50,000 members and nearly 230 local chapters.

In January we launched a petition and legislator-contact effort to help get “Rachel’s Law” passed in the New York state legislature. “Rachel’s Law” was introduced to protect New York authors from intimidation lawsuits filed against them in foreign jurisdictions. Thousands of members signed the petition and/or contacted New York legislators, and in late March the bill passed and was signed into law. The momentum from this victory led to the introduction of similar legislation, entitled “The Free Speech Protection Act,” in the U.S. Congress.

In the spring, with the help of the erstwhile leadership of former board member Jerry Gordon and our colleague Joseph Shahda, some key terrorist websites were taken offline by their American internet service providers. Later in the year this “dynamic duo,” working closely with the staff of Senator Joe Lieberman, helped bring about a new policy at Google/YouTube, which will no longer allow the posting of videos depicting terrorist acts perpetrated against Americans.

In March news stories reported that a charter school in Minnesota, the Tarek ibn Ziyad Academy (TiZA), appeared to be engaging in impermissible promotion of Islam at its taxpayer-funded school. Through email alerts, the actions of our central Minnesota chapter, and other efforts aimed at the Minnesota Department of Education, we called on the Department to take action. It did, launching an investigation of the school. The investigation resulted in the Department of Education issuing two citations to the school for violations of law.

In June we launched a nationwide petition calling on Congress to convene hearings to review extremist materials found in American mosques, a petition we will present to the new Congress in early 2009.

In early August we learned that a Tennessee Tyson Foods plant had negotiated a labor contract with its employees that removed Labor Day as a paid holiday and replaced it with Eid al-Fitr, the Islamic holiday closing the month of Ramadan. In response to an email action alert we sent out, countless ACT! for America members called and emailed Tyson Foods to object to this action. Three days later Tyson Foods issued a press release reinstating Labor Day as one of its paid holidays and removing Eid al-Fitr as a required paid holiday for all employees.

So I want to thank you for all you did to help make all of this possible. When you forwarded one of our emails, or made a contribution, or contacted a chapter leader, or took action on one of our action alerts, you helped move us forward. You helped make these accomplishments possible. We are steadily growing, and our collective voice is getting stronger and harder for politicians to ignore.

We’ve had over 1,500 people sign up on our website to be members in just the past couple of weeks. Kelly Cook, our National Field Director, tells me we’ll add twice as many new chapters this month compared to the last six months.

In the words of our Founding Fathers, “these are the times that try men’s souls.” These are the times that test and strengthen our character. Thankfully, as difficult as things now appear they’re not yet as trying as the times our founders faced. We still have so much to be grateful for.

But we can’t afford to forget that our radical Islamist enemies not only welcome but thrive on chaos and confusion. They’re hoping we get so caught up in the economic challenges facing us that we’ll forget about them. They’re hoping we won’t see them using Shariah-compliant finance to exploit America’s financial challenges and uncertainties. They may very well launch a major terrorist attack in the very near future, calculating that a nation coping with economic distress led by a new President, inexperienced in foreign policy, will lack the will to respond. And without question they will accelerate their efforts to infiltrate every level of our government to manipulate public policy in their favor.

AFA is doing what needs to be done to overcome the political barriers to an effective defense against Islam's relentless encroachment.
I urge you to sign up for the AFA newsletter, to tell your friends about AFA, to join a local chapter in your area, and to read her two books.

Whoever is the most organized is going to win.
And please, those of you in other countries who know of a similar organization in your country, please leave contact information for the organization in the comments to this article. Thank you.

Find out about chapters in other countries by clicking here.

Read more...

What You Can Do About Islam

Thursday

WHEN I TALK to people about Islam's relentless encroachment and the goals and methods of jihad, the first thing they usually say is, "What can we do about it?" Usually this is not said with hopelessness, but with a sense of urgency. If it is the first time they've heard anything about this, they have a kind of panicked look in their eye, and the question comes out as a kind of desperate plead: What can we do?!

This is an entirely appropriate response. I now consider this an indication that someone has really understood the situation. I often get that response after a person has seen Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the West. They get it. And the clearest sign they get it is the earnest question, "What can we do about it?"

I have written an ever-growing article — What Can a Civilian Do to Stop Islam's Relentless Encroachment? — to answer just this question. And I've dedicated a domain name just for that page.

The domain name is:

whatcanyoudoaboutislam.com.

This is now a resource we can all use.

When you're telling someone about jihad, about taqiyya, about the incessant push for concessions, about the passages in the Qur'an that support these things, and then they ask you what can be done about it, you can say, "Go to WhatYouCanDoAboutIslam.com."

You can make a sticker with that domain name on it and stick it to your copies of Obsession when you loan them out. You can print the domain name on a business card and hand it to people when they ask you that question. You can share the domain name on your web site or blog.

Part of the reason people don't like hearing about jihad is they don't know what they can do about it — it's a little too much to confront if nothing can be done. And that's something to keep in mind when you're telling people about this stuff. Always present it in a way that makes it clear we can do something about it.

To give you an idea of the difference between feeling you can do something and feeling you can't, imagine you are told you have terminal cancer, you're going to die, and there's nothing you can do about it. You have a kind of cancer that has no treatment.

Now imagine you're told you have cancer, but if you go through something difficult (like fasting or chemotherapy), it will very likely cure you.

There's a huge difference in how you would take news about cancer, isn't there? The emotional impact would be totally different. The news that you have cancer is much more tolerable the second way. Why?
Only because you can do something about it.

After hearing about the third jihad, people are motivated or at least frightened, and that's a perfect time to give them something practical they can do about it. Tell them they must visit WhatYouCanDoAboutIslam.com.

I am going to keep comments open on that page, so when you come across new things that can be done, please add them. And as I come across new things, I'll add them to the list too. Let's have a single page with a simple and easy-to-remember domain name that we can direct people to.

We need more people to know there are practical things they can do about jihad, and we need more people taking action. WhatYouCanDoAboutIslam.com can help fulfill this need. Let's use it.

Read more...

Identifying Jihadis in America

Tuesday

The following was written by Martel Sobieskey. When I first read it, I thought his suggestion was somewhat extreme, but the further into the article I read, the more sensible it seemed. I would be interested to know what you think about it (in the comments on this article).

Here it is, Sobieskey's "Identifying Jihadis in America:"


THE “SPECTER” of a nuclear bloodbath hangs over America, caused by a jihadist frenzy “foaming at the mouth” for our destruction. In order to “flush out” these nuclear maniacs, registration of the entire Muslim community in America is absolutely essential. The jihadist nuke-America agenda is not an idle threat, particularly since they have already acquired the weapons (see chapter 6 “Ignoring the Booming Nuclear Black Market” of Dr. Paul Williams’s book, Dunces of Doomsday).

Furthermore, experts agree that several thousand jihadists are living comfortably within the Muslim community, a combination of foreign jihadists and “homegrown” jihadists. The “homegrown” varieties are militant Muslims born and raised in the United States. (See Steven Emerson’s book, Jihad Incorporated: A Guide to Militant Islam in the US.)


The incendiary mix of foreign jihadists, “homegrown” jihadists, and nuclear weapons is an “ominous fuse ready to be lit” clearly warning that 500,000 Americans can be vaporized in an instant! This is no paranoid exaggeration, but a clear and present danger. F.B.I. Director, Robert Mueller, informed Ronald Kessler of News Max on May 15, 2007:

“. . . al-qaida’s paramount goal is clear: to detonate a nuclear device that would kill hundreds of thousands of Americans…We are going to be hit at some pointit’s just a question of when and to what extent.”
Failure to Protect Ourselves

The F.B.I. boss nearly guarantees we will suffer a jihadist nuclear attack, yet America remains paralyzed with self-complacency and disbelief. Have we become a nation of sheep ready for the slaughter?

The answer is yes; proven by our failure to enact the safeguards designed to protect us.

What must be done? We need to immediately implement the 1940 Alien Registration Act (Smith Act), and the 1798 Alien Enemies Act thereby registering all Muslims living in the USA and placing them under intense scrutiny.

This is no time to be polite, servile, or politically cowardly. We need to get the job done. According to Dr. Graham T. Allison of Harvard University: 500,000 killed would be the number of instant victims if a small (10 kiloton) nuke were set off in New York’s Times Square on a typical day. Dr. Allison gives the carnage a greater than 50% chance of happening.


Dr. Allison’s website at www.nuclearterror.org is crucially informative and brings home the harsh realities by providing a nuclear blast map which can be applied to your own city. His book, Nuclear Terrorism: The Ultimate Preventable Catastrophe, reveals that nuclear terrorism is inevitable if we continue on our present course, which in my opinion, is “floating” like a sitting duck waiting to get blown out of the water.

Why not break the impasse and protect ourselves? Registering Muslims will “throw a monkey wrench” into the jihadist plan, greatly reducing the probability of an attack. Please think deeply about this. Do you want to stop a nuclear attack or not?


The Precedent for Registration

In times of emergency all nations must monitor and register large groups of people, if they wish to survive. Unfortunately, a large percentage of Americans have lost their survival instinct, taking for granted their privileged lives which they mistakenly believe are “cost” free. They couldn’t be more wrong. Each American is obligated to share the “cost” of protecting our nation. Already, more than 4,000 soldiers have been killed, and a few million others are serving in the military, police and security community.

Compared to these heroes, registration is a minor inconvenience and minuscule price to pay. Shamefully, many Americans have become so selfishly spoiled and hubristic that they flatly refuse to suffer even the slightest inconvenience when asked to protect their nation. You will find these loathsome fools screaming “bloody murder” at the slightest hint of security measures such as registration of Muslims or the Patriot Act. No loyal American or reasonable person will behave so deplorably; such blatant irresponsibility emboldens the jihadists' nuke-America obsession. Registration proved very effective during WWII and is infinitely more necessary today.

Prior to World War II, a total of 4,741,971 aliens were registered in a period of 4 months, in order to uncover the enemies hiding within. President Roosevelt was prudent enough to make a “hot pursuit” of potential saboteurs. As a result, he successfully prevented internal attacks upon our homeland for the duration of WWII.

Today, it is imperative we follow Roosevelt’s example and register every Muslim 14 years or older. Each must be required to submit their photo, fingerprints, address, date and place of birth, physical description, occupation, employment history, arrest record, names of relatives in the USA and abroad, memberships in clubs, organizations, societies, and other pertinent data. The harshest penalties, for those who fail to register or lie, such as prison or deportation, must necessarily apply.


Michelle Malkin’s book, In Defense of Internment, provides a definitive report completely debunking the erroneous views of those opposing registration. Obviously, in times of great emergency, such as the present nuclear threat, national security takes precedence over the civil liberties of peacetime. Once again, ask yourself do you want to stop a nuclear attack on our homeland or not? Obviously, we must be proactive in preventing it.

The Alien Enemies Act of 1798 requires that when any predatory incursion is attempted or threatened against the United States, the President can make a public proclamation in order to single out and “round up the group” within which the enemies are hiding. This is exactly the course which needs to be pursued with the Muslim community today. It is a fact that the jihadists are hiding within our homeland and we must do whatever it takes to stop to them. It is well past time to “take off the gloves” and get down to the business of protecting ourselves. The noble adage — the price of freedom is eternal vigilance — has never been more relevant.

Weak-Minded

Nearly 50% of Americans are so weak-minded that the jihadist hate-America lobby believes that by simply calling us names like Islamophobe we will “shrink up” and let down our guard — enabling them to nuke us. So far they are 100% correct; nearly the entire Democratic Party refuses to defend our national security and remains adamantly in denial about the jihadist nuclear threat to our homeland. They are definitely suffering from the same mental disorder that afflicted Neville Chamberlain when he believed “romancing” and appeasing Adolph Hitler would bring peace to the world.

But the facts cry out loudly; never has there been a more urgent need to single out a group of people. Registration will serve as a much-needed litmus test, sorting out the elusive moderate Muslims from the militants.

Certainly, anyone who protests registration is not a moderate Muslim but an enemy to the United States’ national security. If you believe such opinion to be impolite, then most likely you have failed to “face the fact” that this is the age of jihadist nuclear terrorism.

Please think deeply: The jihadists possess an extremely entrenched homicidal mania and religious fervor to nuke us and their plan is well underway. This point cannot be overemphasized.


A Million Times More Dangerous

One of the world’s richest men, insurance magnate, Warren Buffet believes a nuclear terrorist attack on American soil is going to occur. At an annual meeting of Berkshire Hathaway he stated, “We’re going to have something of a major nuclear event in this countryIt will happen — whether it will happen in 10 years or 10 minutes, or 50 years…it’s virtually a certainty.”

Today the threat of a jihadist nuclear attack on American soil is a million times more dangerous than the threat by conventional weapons during WWII. But things get even worse. The jihadists plan to nuke 7 American cities simultaneously and kill 4 million Americans. This is a sinister goal well-documented by Dr. Paul Williams. They will do just that if we fail to prevent it.

What is wrong with us? We registered 5 million people prior to WWII, but now, facing a nuclear weapon, we remain inert. Have we become our own worst enemy? The answer is yes.

Let’s compare the gravity of the situation. Today less than a dozen nuclear jihadists can vaporize 500,000 Americans in an instant. On the other hand, during WWII 350,000 Americans were killed during a 4-year period, and it took several million enemy soldiers armed with enormous amounts of weaponry to do so. Without doubt the risk we now face is astounding, beyond belief, and makes WWII seem infinitesimal.

Consequently, we can no longer afford to give a “religious pass” to the Muslim community because the majority of them are not nuclear jihadists. To the contrary, the severity of the nuclear threat is so far off the charts, we are forced to subject all Muslims to the utmost scrutiny in order to weed out the bad apples hiding amongst them. There is no other choice.

Conclusion

Anyone who disagrees with registration of the Muslims in America is a suicidal fool if not an outright enemy to American national security. Such chastisement is well justified because the consequences of failing to act are apocalyptic. “One bad apple spoils the whole bunch” especially when it’s a nuclear apple. We must take out all the stops in order to thwart the jihadist dream of massacring us on our own soil.

So enormous is the jihadist nuke-America threat that the Department of Homeland Security developed a special department called the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO) on April 15, 2005. Well done indeed! One of their strategic objectives is to establish situational awareness through information sharing and analysis. The registration of Muslims will greatly enhance and facilitate this objective, proving to be the key ingredient for success. On the other hand, continuing the status quo of non-registration will neutralize, if not forecast a failure (which means we get nuked).

Registering Muslims is obligatory for preventing a jihadist nuclear blast on American soil as well as the other types of WMD’s. It is the epitome of negligence not to implement all methods of prevention. Remember 9/11 anyone? Let not history repeat itself by making a commission — after the debacle — in order to decide what should have been done to prevent it. Let’s do the right thing now!

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Martel Sobieskey has 36 years research experience in the field of religious conditioning and its relationship to warfare. He is greatly alarmed that American politicians, military commanders, educators, journalists, intelligence analysts, security and police personnel have failed to comprehend the deeply entrenched jihadist conditioning inherent in all of Islam — moderates included.

Read more...

Please Watch the Movie Obsession

Sunday

AS I WROTE awhile back, Tom Trento of WatchObsession.org sent me fifty copies of the DVD, Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the West, free of charge, and I fulfilled my promise of getting each of them into someone's hands within 25 days. I mailed some of them to friends and family living in other states, and the following is a letter I was going to send along with the DVD, but the letter was so long, I decided not to send it.

I liked it, however, so I thought I'd share it with you. Maybe you could start your own campaign by sending DVDs to your family and friends and copy and paste parts of this letter along with it:

I'm sending you this DVD because I want you to watch it. After you watch it, you can do whatever you want with it. This is yours to keep. It is important for everyone in the free world to know about the goals of Jihadis and how they are accomplishing those goals. It affects us all.

Among other things, the movie shows what happens on television in Muslim countries. It shows what they say to each other, which is something entirely different than what they say to non-Muslims. They are employing the Islamic principle of taqiyya, which means "religious deception." According to the Qur'an, Islam is in a state of permanent war with non-Muslims, and since deception is a common tactic in warfare, Muslims have permission and even encouragement from Islamic theology to lie to non-Muslims in the service of Islam.

You'll see several examples of taqiyya on this film. It's one of the reasons Westerners are generally in the dark about what's going on.

What's going on is that Jihadis — people who intend to fulfill Allah's command to fight for Islam until Allah's religion rules the world — are actively working toward that goal all over the world. Even within our country.

The movie is accurate. If anything, my only criticism would be that the film is too
generous to Islam. I have read the Qur'an cover to cover, and I've been reading about the goals and methods of the Islamic agenda for seven years now (and you know I don't read superficially), and I can tell you, as rabble-rousing as this film may seem to you, it is a balanced report of what is actually happening.

Jihadis feel that Allah means what it says in the Qur'an — that the only way to guarantee your passage to Paradise is to die while fighting for Islam, that the only legitimate form of law and government is Shari'a (Islamic law), and that fighting for political goals is a religious duty and a form of worship. There are millions of these people in the world right now and they are actively and successfully recruiting new holy warriors every day.

There are many possible solutions to this problem, but none of them can be accomplished without a sufficient number of non-Muslims becoming aware of all this. The first and most important thing that needs to be accomplished is education about something that most people (if they've heard about it at all) have actually refused to believe.

It can't be true, right? All religions are basically the same. Unfortunately, no, they're not. Most religions may have much in common, but Islam is unique in its political aspirations, its direct commands to kill non-believers, and its methods of deception.

This is not racism and it is not Islamophobia. It is simply criticism of a religious and political doctrine. And religious and political criticism are perfectly legitimate in a free country.

And this is not a "smear campaign" or "hate speech." This is not guesswork. There is no need to twist the teachings into something scary. It's scary enough for non-Muslims as it is. You can read (and should) the Qur'an yourself. It is only about as long as the New Testament.

I hope I don't sound like an alarmist. To help me seem more reasonable, consider this: This film is relatively new; the DVD was released September 11th, 2007. In the time between then and now, Jihadis have committed 2,317 deadly attacks, with each attack killing at least one, and usually several per attack. Why? To intimidate, to gain concessions, and with the long term goal to take over countries, which they have successfully done in several countries recently.

I'm looking at the pages listing the attacks now. I had to print them out so I could accurately count the number of attacks since 9/11/07. It took me a long time just to count them all. To print all the attacks since
Obsession was published, I had to print 87 pages of small type. I got the information from TheReligionOfPeace.com, which has been meticulously documenting only verifiable attacks since 9/11/01. Their ongoing list details how many people were killed in each attack, where the attack occurred, and a brief description of what happened. Many of these 2,317 attacks killed a lot of people. One random page I'm looking at now lists one attack that killed 11 people, one that killed 22 people, and one that killed 31 people, plus many smaller attacks.

Almost every country on earth is involved in this. It is a global war. On the page I'm looking at, several attacks occurred in Iraq, Thailand, Afghanistan, Pakistan, two occurred in Algeria, and one attack each occurred in India, Ingushetia, and Jordan — and this is in the span of three days. On other pages, you see attacks in China, Israel (of course), Britain, Somalia, Yemen, Germany, Lebanon, the Philippines, Chechnya, Sudan, Angola, Austria, Nigeria, Turkey, and it goes on and on. It is easy to see these as separate, isolated instances. But the Jihadis themselves think of this as a global war — the nation of Islam against the non-believers.

Violence is only one of the forms jihad can take. Immigrating into countries and then gaining concessions for Islam from within the country is another. Here are some concessions Islam has gained since
Obsession came out on DVD:

1. Random House, after buying the rights to publish an historical novel about Mohammad, was warned by Muslims that violence might ensue with the publishing of the book, so they chose not to publish it. They were silenced by intimidation.

2. Shari'a law is now practiced in several places in Britain, legally.

3. A short video posted on YouTube that tried to get people to sign a petition to stop Shari'a law in Britain was removed from YouTube because Muslims complained. (It has since been republished.)

4. In Hamtramck, Michigan, the City Council waved the noise ordinances in deference to the mosque there to allow then to broadcast an amplified call to prayer throughout the neighborhood.

5. Public pools in Canada now provide private swim times to Muslim women so they can avoid the 'shame' of being seen by men. As the co-founder of Human Rights Service in Oslo, Hege Storhaug, said after Muslims tried to pressure Norway into making alcohol off limits on certain days in restaurants and discos because they felt "uncomfortable" around people drinking, "All the time it's Muslims who come with special requirements," she says. "We never hear a peep from Catholics, Jews, Hindus etc."

6. After a Danish newspaper published some cartoons depicting Mohammad — nothing more offensive than politicians suffer every day all over the free world — Muslims rioted all over Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, leaving 187 people dead. Afterward, many newspapers refused to reprint the cartoons out of fear. They were intimidated into silence by Muslims.

7. A documentary called Undercover Mosque, found that mosques in London promote violent jihad against non-Muslims, encourage murder and intolerance, and promote Shari'a, which means advocating the overthrow of the British government. A year and a half after the film aired, the same film crew did a follow-up documentary. Nothing had changed. The British government, out of political correctness, allows it to happen. Any other group would be stopped. But Islam gets special accommodation. Because they are so wonderful? No. Because they are pushy, vengeful and organized.

8. In Britain, husbands with multiple wives have been given the go-ahead to claim extra welfare benefits following a year-long Government review. Even though bigamy is a crime in Britain, this official decision means that polygamous marriages can now be recognized formally by the state, so long as the weddings took place in countries where the arrangement is legal. The outcome will chiefly benefit Muslim men with more than one wife, as is permitted under Islamic law (Shari'a). Britain's concession is helping Jihadis fulfill one of their most important goals: To gain a numerical advantage. Belgium and Germany also offer benefits to polygamists' various wives.

9. At Melbourne’s Monash University there are separate toilets for Muslims.

10. The Times of London reported that "Knorbert the piglet has been dropped as the mascot of Fortis Bank, after it decided to stop giving piggy banks to children for fear of offending Muslims." (Pigs are an offensive, unclean animal to Muslims.) Recently a local government council in Britain prohibited its workers from having knickknacks on their desks representing Winnie the Pooh’s sidekick Piglet.

Islam is an aggressive religion that will not stop. They think they've got the only valid way to live, and they have been given divine sanction to force everyone else to follow it. They will push for concessions until they get enough political power to try to seize the reigns of power. Until more people know what they're up to, they will operate unimpeded.


I urge you to watch this important film. It is produced with a commitment to accuracy. What you see may well change the way you see the world.

Read more...

Islamophobia

Tuesday

In Robert Spencer's book, The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam, he quotes somebody else's long definition of "Islamophobia," which includes "attacking the entire religion of Islam as a problem for the world." And then Spencer writes:

Does labeling as "Islamophobic" the practice of "attacking the entire religion of Islam as a problem for the world" mean that it is also Islamophobic to focus attention on the Qur'an and the Sunnah of the Prophet as motivations for terrorist activity? If so, then jihad terrorists worldwide are themselves "Islamophobic," for, as we have seen, they routinely point to jihad passages from the Qur'an and Hadith to justify their actions.

In other words, if I say Islam is a political religion that mandates intolerance and violence against non-Muslims, that makes me an "Islamophobe." But it also makes Osama bin Laden an Islamophobe.

Islamophobia is a misleading term, as I'll explain in a minute, and yet it is used with great seriousness by governments all over the world, in the media, and even by the United Nations.

But "Islamophobia" is a made-up word. It isn't tenable, plausible, or convincing once you really look at it. Using the term is merely a way to slander those who have legitimate concerns about implications and consequences of the teachings of Islam. It is a way to prevent legitimate criticism and debate about an important global problem. As the historian, Victor Davis Hanson wrote:

There really isn't a phenomenon like "Islamophobia — at least no more than there was a "Germanophobia" in hating Hitler or "Russophobia" in detesting Stalinism. Any unfairness or rudeness that accrues from the "security profiling" of Middle Eastern young males is dwarfed by efforts of Islamic fascists themselves — here in the U.S., in the UK, the Netherlands, France, Turkey, and Israel — to murder Westerners and blow up civilians.

Since a phobia is an unreasonable fear of something, the term is inappropriately applied to Islam. It is not unreasonable to fear being blown to smithereens in the name of Islam. As of today, 15,754 deadly attacks have been carried out in the name of Islam since 9/11. They can strike anywhere. They could be a man, woman, or child. They don't look any particular way; they could be Chinese or European or African or Middle Eastern, young or old. But they are driven by a particular ideology — specifically, the teachings of the religion of Islam.

Islamophobia is not a good word for it. A better term might be "legitimate concern."

So here is a message to Islamic apologists: Try something else. Your feeble attempt with the pseudo-word, "Islamophobia" has failed. The term is discredited. As Ralph Waldo Emerson might have put it: "I hope in these days we have heard the last of Islamophobia. Let the word be gazetted and ridiculous henceforward."

Read more about the untenable nature of the word:


1. This is an article that will help you clarify what you're doing when you criticize Islam. It articulates what is wrong with the term "Islamophobia."

2. This is an article written by Ali Sina, the famous ex-Muslim, writing about the term "Islamophobia" and what, specifically makes the term meaningless.

3. This is a video: Robert Spencer's simple plan to end Islamophobia. It's kind of tongue-in-cheek, but he makes some good points, and you might want to send it to anyone who accuses you of being an Islamophobe.

4. And this is an article I wrote to peaceful Muslims who often write to me and tell me I shouldn't criticize Islam. I talk a bit about "Islamophobia" in the article.

5. Bill Warner created a test for Islamophobia: Take the Acid Test for Islamophobia.

Read more...

Worldwide Jihad: The Scope of the Problem

Monday

ISLAMIC TERRORISTS (Jihadis) are killing people. Since 9/11, they've successfully perpetrated 17,127 deadly attacks, many of which killed and maimed large numbers of people, including the London and Madrid bombings.

Not only that, but right now as you read this, orthodox Muslims
are getting military training and bomb-making training around the world via the internet and also in places like the no-man's-land along Pakistan's Western border. And they are successfully recruiting more and more Muslims to their cause.

But that isn't the whole problem.

We also have Muslims with Jihadi political agendas who have emigrated to America, Canada, Australia, Germany, Britain, France, Italy, and the Netherlands, who are having lots of children, who are increasing the Muslim-to-non-Muslim ratios in those countries, who are agitating for special concessions, and who have the goal of Islamizing the government. They are gaining ground in every country throughout the free world. Add to that their constant use of taqiyya (religious deception), which sufficiently confuses non-Muslims and prevents any kind of coherent resistance to the Islamic advance.


But that isn't the whole problem.

There are many countries such as Turkey, Egypt, Lebanon, and Malaysia that used to be budding democracies, but their Muslim-dominated populations have continually and successfully pressured their governments into applying Shari'a law (a system of law lacking the rights of free speech, freedom of religion, or equality between the sexes) more and more stringently.


Islam is on the move everywhere.

But even that does not encompass the whole scope of the problem.

The people of free countries have been disabled. They have been rendered helpless to resist Islamic encroachment. The non-Muslims have disarmed themselves with the doctrine of multiculturalism. The doctrine has streamlined into a mindset that appreciates every culture but our own. And sometimes it has streamlined even further into simply hating our own culture or feeling that we don't even have a culture. (Read more about that here.)

The only way to stop Islam's relentless invasion is for non-Muslims like you and me to join together to defend our values — to protect those values from the Muslims' constant push toward gaining concessions for Islam at the expense of those values. To do this, non-Muslims will have to be clear about what we value, and they had better be values we feel are very important. They need to be values worth fighting for.

Defending our values may be bloody. People may die. In fact, people have died already. When the Danish newspaper published some cartoons of Mohammad, the ensuing riots left 187 people dead. This was a clash between values. The Muslims valued their belief that Mohammad should never be mocked or represented in any form of art. They believe freedom of the press should be limited, especially about Islam.

Non-Muslims in the free world value free speech and the right to say or draw or publish whatever you want, even if it offends someone.


This value — free speech — might be a value important enough to fight for. Multiculturalism is not. Add "freedom of religion" and "equality for women" to freedom of speech, and I think we've got values important enough to be worth defending.

The upshot of all this is that Islam — a politically and militarily aggressive religion — is growing in every way. They are having more offspring than non-Muslims, they're moving in ever greater numbers into free countries because those societies need cheap labor, and they are finding more and more ways to gain concessions, using everything from "litigation jihad" to political bargaining to newspaper ads to a mushrooming of organizations that influence the media and lobby to silence critics and gain advantages for Muslims. The West is sending hundreds of billions of dollars a year directly into the bank accounts of Jihadis who use that money to wage jihad around the world.

And the West has yet to clearly articulate what values it would care to defend against Islam's invasion, thus allowing the invasion to occur almost unimpeded. In fact, in many different ways, the West is assisting in its own demise (opening borders to Muslims, buying oil from Saudi Arabia, for example, and funding the enemy, allowing mosques and madrassas to be built in free countries, publishing articles and textbooks sympathetic to Islam, harshly criticizing and even firing those who are trying to inform people about Islam's political intentions, etc.)

THAT is the scope of the problem.

What can little ol' you do about it? Plenty. Get started right now — we have no time to lose.

Read more...

A Concession That Should Not Be Granted

Saturday

MUSLIMS LIVING IN the West are waging jihad by gaining concessions. And one of the concessions they've been easily attaining in the free world is permission to build mosques by the thousands, usually funded by Saudi oil money, and controlled by Jihadis.

Western countries hardly think twice when Muslims want to build a mosque, because Westerners think of mosques as simply "places of worship." But Jihadis consider mosques on foreign soil to be staging posts for further encroachments into the country with the ultimate goal of establishing the law of Allah in that new land.

In other words, Western countries are allowing Jihadis to build forward bases for their military infiltration
. That might sound like fear-mongering, but it's a plain fact that even Jihadis don't try to hide. Jihad is preached in mosques, and it is not the exception, but the rule. Seditious material is for sale and given to mosque-goers all over the free world. (Read more about the kind of messages promoted in mosques in the United States and Britain.)

In short, a mosque is a military outpost in the invasion of a non-Muslim country.


The book, The Mosque Exposed, is written by two ex-Muslims, S. Solomon and E. Alamaqdisi. In it, they write, "...in Islam...the mosque is always the center, the beginning, and the end of all Islamic affairs..." As Fatwa #26159 says:

"For a mosque is symbol of the presence of Islam, the heartbeat of the Muslim community, an educational outlet where the community is taught to combat evil, ignorance and apostasy. It is a university as well as a court, from where the laws of Allah are promoted, it is a symbol of authority within that community and ultimately within the state and beyond, for the Apostle of Allah said Islam rises and nothing rises above it, for it is the uppermost."

A mosque is just a building. But in Islam, the mosque is the center of their religion, and in Islam the religion is totally encompassing in a way non-Muslims can hardly imagine. As Solomon and Alamaqdisi write:

"Islam cannot be defined only as a religion in the Western sense of the word, neither can it be termed as a faith only. It is a whole encompassing system. It is first and foremost a socio-political and socio-religious system, as well as socio-economic, socio-educational, legislative, judiciary, and military system, cloaked and garbed in religious terminology, with regulations that govern every aspect of the lives of its adherents and their relationships among themselves, and with those that are non-Muslims.

"The main institution that plays a central role in the Muslim community directing their lives and almost everything related to that is the mosque."

Muslims are required to emulate Mohammad in all ways, and Mohammad used the mosque as a home-base where jihad was declared, where fatwas were made, where indoctrination took place, where raids and attacks were planned, where the planning and building of the Islamic State took place, where military orders were given, and it was in the mosque where Mohammad gave his death sentences to the enemies of Islam.


It says over seventy times in the Qur'an that a Muslim should follow Mohammad's example.

Given all that, a new policy should be established in democracies around the world: No more mosques can be built. And the ones that already exist should be closely monitored. When a mosque is found to promote sedition, it should be closed. A new mosque is a concession that should not be granted.

Read more...

Whoever Is Most Organized Will Win

Thursday

In an account of Robert Spencer's speech at East Tennessee State University, I read that the Muslim activists on campus effectively ruined his speech and tried to discredit him before and during his talk. There were probably only 20 Muslims involved, but they were organized, and the counterjihad activists were not organized enough to defend or protect Spencer from this attack.

Spencer managed to deliver his talk, but to many in the audience, he appeared as one lone voice, isolated, hated, and without support. Why? Because the Muslims were organized and the defenders of freedom were not.

And the same principle is being demonstrated in many places in the free world: The Muslims are organized and the freedom-defenders are not. So Muslims have a disproportionate political influence. They create organizations that sue people. They create organizations to lobby politicians. They create organizations to give the press answers on Islamic questions. They are winning. Why?

They're organized.

But they are totally outnumbered. And it would not take much to prevent them from waging jihad by gaining concessions, or getting people fired for criticizing Islam, or helping Jihadis immigrate to our country to promote jihad in the mosques, or anything else we want to stop them from doing — we could easily do it if only we were organized. There is something missing and it is badly needed: United action.

Brigitte Gabriel has stepped into the gap and created ACT! For America. It is the most organized response to the jihad against the United States I have yet come across. I urge you to sign up for the AFA newsletter, to share the organization with all your friends, to join a local chapter in your area, and to read her two books. They are heading toward a million members and have hired a lobbyist. With a lobbyist representing a million members, politicians want to talk to that lobbyist. ACT! For America has their ear.

ACT! For America is for the United States. If you know of a similar organized group in your country, please post the organization's contact information in the comments of this section.

Let's organize. Whoever is the most organized is going to win.

Read more...

Multiculturalism and the Defense of Liberty

Wednesday

MULTICULTURALISM says we should have no arrogance about our own culture and we should be open to the teachings and practices of other cultures. We should at least look at cultures to see if they have something to teach us.

But given the way the human mind tends to streamline and simplify, multiculturalism has been streamlined in many minds into "my own culture is evil."

The original purpose of multiculturalism was to prevent the self-righteous arrogance of European and American Judeo-Christian cultures. There was a time when they encountered people from other cultures and they judged them to be barbaric, savage, or simplistic. In many cases Europeans and Americans used force to impose their own "superior" culture on the native cultures they came across.

This kind of blind arrogance is ugly and it is right and good that it has been discredited. It other words,
multiculturalism is a good thing.

But in our passionate commitment to multiculturalism, we tossed out a very important item:
Our own culture. We should look our own culture to find what's good about it, and we should do it just as impartially and as appreciatively as we look at other cultures.

One of the things we will find is that the basic principles of liberty and equality are so pervasive in our culture, we take them for granted. They are like water to a fish. They go into the background and we stop noticing them. Some Americans have told me "we don't really have a culture."

But if our pervasive right to liberty and equality were suddenly taken away and we were dropped into some exotic and seemingly attractive culture in say, Somalia or China or Saudi Arabia or the Maldives, the lack of natural freedom and equality would be shockingly noticeable.


But we don't live in those cultures. We enjoy all the protections of liberty and equality we have enjoyed our whole lives. In fact, many of those liberties and equalities have
improved over our lifetimes. This all seems right and proper to us.

But it is not natural. It is not inevitable. It is not "self-evident." In fact, if you look at the history of civilization, what you see is a glaring lack of liberty and equality all over the world and as far back as we have historical records. And unless those liberties and equalities are protected and defended, they will be lost. Really.

Jihadis are actively working to take them away and replace our guaranteed rights with the law of Allah (Shari'a). Luckily for the
blind multiculturalists who think their own culture is evil, others are busy protecting their liberty and equality for them at the moment.

You probably know all this already. But when you encounter someone who has this my-own-culture-is-evil attitude, speak up and explain this concept. We need every ally in this fight we can get. Our culture of liberty and equality needs to be defended. As Robert Spencer said, "People who are ashamed of their own culture will not defend it."

Explain to them what the world is like in other parts of the world. Explain to them how women in Saudi Arabia cannot go outside their home unless they are accompanied by their husband or a male relative. Explain to them that in Iran they have "clothing police" that go around beating and arresting women if their ankles show. Explain to them that in Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Somalia, if a woman is raped, she is usually jailed and sometimes stoned to death for "fornication." Encourage them to watch Osama the movie and Not Without My Daughter.

You can do all this with the attitude that you are on their side. They want to be multicultural. You can wholeheartedly agree: Multiculturalism is great. Studying other cultures is illuminating. And then educate them on how some other cultures live today. Compare and contrast those cultures with the freedoms and equality we enjoy in this culture.

Explain to them also that there are billionaires, and tens of thousands of skilled Jihadis, and well-funded groups of politically-savvy lawyers, all working actively to overthrow our own government and establish those same restrictive laws on everybody here. They are successfully
intimidating with violence and also waging jihad by gaining concessions.

Liberty and equality are not ours alone. They are features of many cultures. But they are salient and foundational features of our own culture, and in the interest of appreciating all cultures, these features should be seen for what they are: Precious and worth protecting. Handled the right way, even a young, passionate multiculturalist should be able to see that.

Read more...

An Example of Taqiyya

Tuesday

IN THE BOOK, Terrorist Hunter: The Extraordinary Story of a Woman Who Went Undercover to Infiltrate the Radical Islamic Groups Operating in America, Rita Katz wrote about being at an IAP conference in Chicago. IAP is the Islamic Association for Palestine. There were lots of booths at the conference for "charitable" organizations, and at one of these booths, Katz met a man she already knew about: Muhammad Salah. She pretended she didn't know who he was, and he introduced himself as a "Muslim human rights activist."

Katz, a non-Muslim woman dressed as a Muslim, wrote, "He was small, thin, nearly bald. Totally harmless looking." He told her these conferences were so important because "we can teach you about the oppression and sufferings of Muslims in America and all over the world."

Then he told Katz his story. He had been a Palestinian with an American citizenship, a used-car salesman, working in Chicago when he went to Israel to "visit family and friends." But in Israel he was arrested by the Israeli authorities and thrown into prison for five years!

Katz looked appropriately appalled and asked
why in heaven's name would they put him in prison? "Because the Israelis oppress innocent Palestinians," he said. "And do you know what is the most shocking part? When I returned to the U.S., after I was tortured and I thought I was going to die in that prison, the Americans placed me under investigation and froze my assets! Me, an innocent citizen, a car dealer, a family man, father of five!"

To any other kafir this probably would have been a convincing story. The poor, oppressed Muslim! It's just wrong to treat people that way. Those Israelis must be very cruel. Those Americans are so oppressive to Muslims!

But Katz was not an ordinary kafir. She researched people like Salah for a living. She knew all about him. This frail, innocent-looking man was the leader of the worldwide military wing of Hamas, a brutal terrorist organization! When he was arrested in Israel he had a hundred thousand dollars in cash on him. In his testimony, he admitted the money was supposed to go to "members of Hamas's military wing." He displayed detailed inside knowledge of Hamas's structure and funding, and his testimony was later used as evidence in the New York trial of Musa Abu Marzook, the leader of the political bureau of Hamas (and the man who had appointed Salah to his position as leader of the military wing).


Katz writes:

"Salah disclosed (in his testimony) that he'd been authorized by Marzook to recruit individuals for training in the uses of explosives to fight in the 'holy war.' In the United States, Salah began training ten such recruits, three of whom were chosen to carry out attacks. In addition to supervising the building of bombs, explosives, and remote detonation devices, Salah was instructed by Marzook to develop biological and chemical weapons for Hamas."
When Nasser Hidmi was caught trying to detonate a bomb in Israel, he said he had been chosen by none other than the poor, innocent, abused, oppressed Muslim, Muhammad Salah.

This is an example of taqiyya, the principle of religious deception. According to mainstream Islamic doctrine, Islam is in a permanent state of war with any non-Muslim who opposes the rule of Shari'a law. And in war, deceit is a legitimate tactic.

In other words, as long as it helps the Islamic goal of making the whole world submit to Shari'a law, it is perfectly all right to lie and deceive.

When I was trying to figure out what I would choose as the three most important things to tell a non-Muslim about Islam, taqiyya was one of the three. The use of taqiyya is the main reason most non-Muslims are so confused about the real nature of Islam — they are constantly being intentionally deceived by Islamic supremacists posing as reasonable, "moderate" Muslims, who are thoroughly fooling everyone from political leaders to the media that "Islam is a religion of peace" and that "Islam has been hijacked by extremists."

What they don't want non-Muslims to know is that Islamic teachings are highly political and it is a Muslim's religious duty to strive to accomplish Islam's primary political goal — the establishment of worldwide Shari'a law — in any way he can for his whole life.

Why wouldn't Islamic supremacists want non-Muslims to know this? Because they can make a lot more progress toward their goal if most of us are in the dark.

But now you know. If you don't, read the Qur'an and find out for yourself. And then spread the word.


How Taqiyya Alters Islam’s Rules of War

Read more...

Early Prevention of Bigotry and Racism

Monday

WHEN YOU'RE talking to non-Muslims and you say something unflattering about Islam, most Westerners will try to defend Islam. They tend to see what you're saying through the filter of "racism" or "bigotry," and toward such things they have an automatic response: Protect the poor abused Muslims from hatred and fear-based reactions.

They may envision lynchings. They don't want to see racial profiling. They don't want to have interment camps like the Japanese suffered during WWII. Since they see your criticism as bigotry or racism, they are unthinkingly and reflexively opposed to a perfectly normal and legitimate activity in a free country: Political and religious criticism.

One of our most treasured guaranteed rights is the right to critique the doctrines of any political or religious group. The fact that it might be offensive to someone is exactly why free speech has to be protected (if it didn't bother anyone, there would be no need to protect it). (
Read more about that here.)

Hopefully you are not a bigot or a racist, but whether you are or not, racism has nothing to do with criticism of Islamic doctrine. Islam is not a race or an ethnic group. There are Muslims of every race. And there are more non-Arab Muslims than Arab Muslims.

If you're not a racist, whoever balks at your criticism of Islamic doctrines and thinks you're being racist actually agrees with you, and you should make your agreement on this issue crystal clear.


In fact, we can emphasize the racial issue as an important reason to solve the "Islamic encroachment" issue as soon as possible. Many people in the counterjihad movement think it will take a dirty nuke going off in Chicago or Paris before the free world wakes up. But after a tragedy or a major attack, people will be angry and afraid, and decisions under those circumstances aren't always the sanest decisions. In times like those, people can overreact. In times like those, they do things like put all Japanese people into internment camps. That was a fear-based reaction, and it was bigoted and racist.

We can avoid that kind of overreaction if we talk about Islam now, in calmer times. In other words, talking about Islamic teachings now can help PREVENT racism and bigotry by making sure everyone understands what Islamic teachings are about, and that everyone understands Islam is a doctrine, not a race.

This is a point you should stress when someone seems to resist talking about Islam and who seems irrationally against talking about it. They are probably afraid you're a bigot. They might be afraid even talking about it with you somehow condones racism.


Make it very clear right up front you're against racism, that Islam is not a race, and that conversations like these will prevent racism in the future if something disastrous happens. If racism is what they were concerned about, you will suddenly have their attention.

If those who are not racist think criticizing Islam is racist, it proves an important point. Namely, that it is vital more people understand Islam.

In other words, if you think criticism of Islam is racist, you are demonstrating that you don't understand what Islam is, and you are illustrating exactly why we need to talk about it and learn about it, because if YOU, who are so strongly against racism, think Islam has something to do with race, then how are racist people going to react if a nuclear weapon goes off in downtown Houston and kills a million people?

The world needs to know about Islam — needs to know what it is and what it is not — and this needs to happen as quickly as possible. If you want to help, start here.

Learn more about influencing your friends:

Read more...

Love and Freedom

Friday

THE FOLLOWING WAS written by PinkNeck and published here with her permission. PinkNeck explained some of the basic (not-so-pleasant) teachings of Islam to a woman, and the woman said, among other things, "Do you want to be right or do you want to be happy? Do you want the world to change so you can feel safe and happy? If you want a world of peace add only love. Every event in life is either loving or a cry for love — so love — just love."

This was PinkNeck's response:

Oh I admire your intentions. I believe in love. Truly. But what we must also face is the truth that not all people are good people. About one in twenty-five men, and about one in fifty women have bodies that lack any receptors for oxytocin (a bonding hormone). So, their bodies have no ability to bond with other human beings. These kinds of people have been called many things throughout history. Sociopath is the current word to describe them. And these few people, these cold-blooded humans, DO NOT CARE ABOUT OTHER PEOPLE. And there is no medicine, no therapy, no operation, no way on earth to change them. And they create hell on earth in their wake.

Clearly Mohammad was a sociopath. No one can read the Qur'an and not see that. And the men of Islam are told to try to be just like the prophet Mohammad: Lie and kill and torture non-believers with no regard for anyone who has not submitted to the will of Allah.

I love people deeply. I am loyal and courageous. I am one of the most responsible humans on the planet. But no matter how good I am, it makes no difference to a sociopath. And as long as there are sociopaths (or their followers), the only way to have peace is to have the good people strong enough to defend the innocent.

You want peace, but peace is not laying down your weapons. Peace is only bought by being powerful enough to stop the sociopaths, the Hitlers and Saddams, and now the terrorists of Islam, from taking whatever they want from whoever they want.

You and all those who put their "Give Peace A Chance" stickers on their cars want to be happy just like I want to be happy. But the reality is as long as there are people who don't care about others, you simply MUST have a military able to protect us from those willing to do violence to get what they want. POWER IS THE ONLY MEANS TO CREATE PEACE.

Peace is not bought with love. Peace is bought by being stronger than the sociopaths and the armies they lead. And now the army of Islam has declared war on the Infidels. That's you and me. And every day they lie and kill and torture to try to once again take over the world. This is not the time to be holding good thoughts and trying to act out of love for our enemies. This is a time to face the horrible truth that a so-called "religion" has declared WAR on everyone who won't submit to Allah. And the longer we wait to deal with it, the more their movement grows, the harder it is to stop them. Now they are trying to pass a law in the United Nations making it illegal to say anything bad about Islam.

The people who protest war have caused millions of deaths. Look at WWII. The people protesting the war in the U.S. managed to keep us out of the war for years! Think of how many millions of gypsies and Jews died before the U.S. joined the fight. And think about how powerful Hitler became during that time, making it more difficult and making it cost even more American and British lives to stop his war machine.

In the time it took for you and I to have our little conversation, the count in this Islamic war went from 11,998 attacks (since 9/11) yesterday to 12,009 attacks today. (Here's a site that keeps track of all the attacks since 9/11: http://thereligionofpeace.com/.) In only one day, another eleven attacks!

And every person who is sitting on their hands doing nothing to stop this is allowing innocent people to die at the hands of Jihadis (Islamic warriors). Every time someone says to pray for peace or tells me to find peace in my heart or, like your message that says we should respond in love, well, it allows another innocent human being to die. Every person seeking peace by responding in love
alone is letting down those too weak to protect themselves from the violence of jihad.

I personally think that love would be trying to save those people from the hands of the terrorists. I think true love is trying to stop Islam's relentless encroachment. Love is trying to save lives, not just having good feelings for others.

I hope you and your friends join me in the fight. We can make a difference. Go here to read a list of Citizen Warrior Heroes. These are regular people trying to save the world from jihad.

We fight by telling the truth about this war. And we fight by supporting those willing to stand up and face the threat of jihad — women like Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Wafa Sultan and Nonie Darwish, and the men like Robert Spencer and Geert Wilders. They have seen the threat. They lived it and understand the threat, and they are trying to tell the world. Please listen to them and their stories.

I hope you join me. Please. The future of freedom, and love, depends on it.

The woman wrote back to say PinkNeck doesn't understand the sacred truth of life on the spiritual level and that the solution is for her to go within and find out where her perception of Islam resonates within her.

Here is PinkNeck's response:


This is the TRUTH...on the physical level. These women are scarred for life, victims of Islamic ideas (about the subjugation of women, the total control over women by men, and the justified use of force by their male relatives and husbands to punish them, and even kill them).

The people listed below have all died since we started talking...and your response is you want me to "go within and try to figure out where my perception of this religion resonates within me"? You've got to be kidding!!! Go play on your mystical level. I don't have the time to deal with such utter nonsense.

Latest Offerings from the Religion of Peace:

10/6/2008 (Mogadishu, Somalia) - al-Shabab terrorists lob mortars into a marketplace. Children are among the seventeen civilians killed.

10/6/2008 (Merka, Somalia) - Islamic militia attack a humanitarian vehicle, leaving one worker dead.

10/6/2008 (Punjab, Pakistan) - Holy Warriors strike a party held at a home. Nearly two dozen people are blown to death.

10/5/2008 (al-Tayeba, Egypt) - A 19-year-old Christian is shot to death by a Muslim mob.

10/5/2008 (Zanjili, Iraq) - Terrorists attack a funeral with automatic weapons, killing four innocents.

10/5/2008 (Mosul, Iraq) - Fundamentalists gun down a butcher in his shop.

Figures above are from thereligionofpeace.com.

Read more...

Copyright

All writing on CitizenWarrior.com is copyright © CitizenWarrior.com 2001-2099, all rights reserved.

Article Spotlight

One of the most unusual articles on CitizenWarrior.com is Pleasantville and Islamic Supremacism.

It illustrates the Islamic Supremacist vision by showing the similarity between what happened in the movie, Pleasantville, and what devout fundamentalist Muslims are trying to create in Islamic states like Syria, Pakistan, or Saudi Arabia (and ultimately everywhere in the world).

Click here to read the article.


Citizen Warrior Heroes

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Visit the blog: Citizen Warrior Heroes.

No More Concessions to Islam

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Visit the blog: Concessions to Islam.

  © Free Blogger Templates Columnus by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP