How Islam Protects Itself From Legitimate Criticism in Free Countries

SOMEONE EMAILED a comment about the article Whose Side Am I On? And I thought he made some points worth reading. I asked if I could post the comment, and the author said yes. Here, then, is his comment:

There is high illiteracy rate in Muslim majority countries and also centuries of inbreeding (marriage among cousins sanctioned by Mohammad who they have to emulate) have depressed the populations' I.Q.... Oftentimes their ability to rationalize is warped since they are indoctrinated from childhood by the Gestapos of Islam — the alim ulemas, the religious clerics who themselves learn the elements of barbaric Shariah verbatim from prior generations of clerics. The clerics are like the vectors/carriers of this deadly Islamic mental virus/meme infecting virgin populations of human beings, generation after generation, conditioning them to become mindless zombies obedient to the trilogy of Islam (Koran, Hadith and Sira/Sunna).

The indoctrination takes place in mosques (and schools/madrassahs) which we are allowing to mushroom all over infideldom so that those educated ones who migrate will transmit the mental virus further to virgin populations outside of the Dar ul Islam into Dar ul Harb. The irony of the whole situation is that immigrant Muslims who escape the harsh and draconian rule of Islam/Shariah oftentimes dream of introducing Islam and Shariah into this very haven that affords them all the freedoms and choice that only an infidel majority society can afford them. Additionally the children of immigrant or converted Muslims oftentimes are even more radical than their parents! Especially if they have been exposed to radicalization at the mosque (and that probably includes all the mosques in the US of A).

Truly Islam is a vicious mental virus/meme that distorts one's sense of reality and ability to rationalize. The million dollar question is what are we, uninfected human beings going to do about it?

When I asked him if I could post his comments, he wrote:

Yes! Please post my comments. By the way, we have an excellent local site (http://www.harlingenactchapter.org/) which is a chapter of ACT! for America. We wonder if we could link, or have you list us in your sidebar, if you do that.

We have an excellent section in Spanish with very nice articles, references and also videos for Spanish speakers (http://www.harlingenactchapter.org/Spanish.html). We felt the Spanish section was important as Islamists are targeting blacks and Hispanic minorities to further give the Islamic Meme a veneer of 'race' so that it will enjoy an additional layer of protection aside from the being mistakenly classified as a "religion."

If a large number of Islam are racial minorities, it would be politically suicidal to criticize Islam, since it could be misconstrued as "racism," which of course (and rightly so) is taboo in the US and the West. This double protection of the veneers of race and religion would allow the Islamic Meme to become further entrenched in the host country to the point of being impossible to dislodge.

Thanks,
Mahendra, (an expatriate from a Southeast Asian Muslim Majority country)

When I asked if I could post that latest comment too, he added even more:

The locality that I am in is now importing more and more Islamic immigrants and professionals. However, a profession, education, three-piece suit and tie does not a rational person make. My and others' experience is that an engineer or a physician who is indoctrinated/infected by the Islamic Meme will continue defending the meme and try to propagate the meme by hook or by crook. Recently in our locality two medical professionals were indicted by the federal govt. for illegally transferring millions of dollars to Iran and other Islamist umbrella organizations that are engaged in Jihad against infidels! The question of immigration and mosques and madrassahs are very real problems. Immigrant Muslims are vectors for the Islamic meme and the prime directive of the meme is to propagate the meme by all means possible...you have your hands full!

I am an expatriate and have travelled the world and am familiar as to the nature of the beast.

- Mahendra

Read more...

"You Are a Xenophobe"

THIS IS ANOTHER in our series, Answers to Objections. The following was posted by Roland Shirk on Jihad Watch, and I thought it might be a useful tactic against blind multiculturalists:

One of the silliest yet most persistent tactics that I've heard used to dismiss the arguments of civilizational patriots (or anti-jihadists or Islamo-realists — take your pick) is to lump us in with some ideology or another — preferably one that is widely discredited. Some assume that all of us are radically anti-religious, or white supremacist, or thoughtless Colonel Blimps who blindly despise every culture but our own. We believe, in the words of Nancy Mitford's fictionalized father, that "abroad is bloody, and foreigners are fiends." These charges are persistent, and we have to waste a fair amount of time refuting them.

One useful tactic, I suggest, is to turn them on their head. If someone accuses you of being a xenophobe, inquire what the opposite of that is. Most likely, your critic will say something like: "A tolerant person," or "a liberal." At that point, you can correct him: "No, the counterpart of someone who is mindlessly hostile to foreign people and things is someone who promiscuously accepts them, who snobbishly prefers them over things home-grown and domestic. If you think I'm a xenophobe, I suggest you might unwittingly have become a xenomaniac. Now what would be a moderate common ground, a golden mean between those two extremes?"

With those amenable to rational argument, such a gambit just might work. With those who aren't, you shouldn't waste your time. I don't engage such people, but rather make a point of mocking them (gently at first, then with a rising level of ridicule, like boiling frogs) till they stop emitting pink clouds of nonsense from every bodily orifice. If there's no hope of that, at least I make sure that innocent third parties who overhear or read the exchange know better than to give these dupes any credence.

Read the whole article>>>

Read more...

Whose Side Am I On?

I HAVE OFTEN said that when you tell non-Muslims some basic principles of Islam, many of them think you are insulting Islam. They think, "How can you accuse people of such terrible things?" After simply explaining a few basic Islamic doctrines to people, many of them have told me it was a terrible indictment against the Islam.

But I always try to make the point that this is what they believe, and the faithful do not think of it as an indictment at all. In fact, calling it an indictment is the ultimate insult. Calling it an indictment is insulting to a devout Muslim. In other words, calling a list of Islamic principles "an indictment" means you believe there is something fundamentally bad about those principles, and since a Muslim believes these principles are Allah's last word and the only true expression of divine will on Earth, if you think there is anything bad about it, you are insulting Allah, the Prophet, and all Muslims. It doesn't get any more insulting than that.

I just got a great example of this attitude on my article, Basic Principles of Islam. Someone left this comment:

Your articles are extremely interesting.

You claim to be against Islam but its clear that any non-muslim that actually reads what you have written would end up being closer to Islam and more likely to embrace it.

I am trying to work out if you have either been counter-productive or are an extremely intelligent Muslim who is giving dawah (missionary work for Islam) from a reverse psychological point of view.

Either way I hope you keep up the good work of Allah and may he reward you for your deeds if your intentions are pure.

Allah Hafiz

Now think about it. This guy thinks I am promoting Islam, selling people on it, yet in my article I have listed as basic Islamic principles things like subjugating women, using a double standard, using warfare and bloodshed to spread the religion, the command that Muslims create Islamic governments, Muslims are forbidden to leave the religion, dying in jihad is the only way to guarantee a Muslim man's passage to Paradise, etc.

By telling people about these basic Islamic principles, the commenter thinks I am doing a great service selling people on his "wonderful" religion!

Stranger than fiction.

In the future, if someone thinks you are insulting Islam when you list its basic principles, I hope you can straighten them out. I hope you can make it clear that their belief that you are insulting Islam is what would really be insulting to a faithful Muslim.

Read more...

Forum: How to Defeat Islam - Non-Violently

IN A COMMENT on the article, Internment Camps for Muslims, Trencherbone left a link to a forum on how to defeat Islam. The opening statement of the forum is excellent. I will reprint the first part of it here, but I encourage you to go to the site and read the whole thing. Here's the first part:

If we don't defeat Islam as an ideology it will exterminate us culturally and physically Islam is an utterly ruthless totalitarian political system disguised as a religion. Islam will literally stop at nothing to achieve its objective of world domination, with all non-Muslims exterminated or enslaved. Muslims who deny this are lying (Muslims are encouraged to tell lies to further the expansion of Islam). Terrorism is an intrinsic and inseparable part of Islam.

Consequently, the ideology of Islam MUST be defeated. It must be consigned to the dustbin of history along with those other vicious totalitarianisms — Nazism and Communism. The alternative is our extermination as a civilisation, and the whole world being plunged into an endless theocratic Dark Age.

There Can Be No Violent Solution

In an age of nuclear weapons, the option of exterminating Islam the way we exterminated Nazism — by world war — is unthinkable. Apart from anything else, there is no guarantee that the West could win an all-out World War III against Islam. Our infrastructure, government and military have been too far infiltrated by jihadists. There would be thousands of Fort Hood style massacres of our troops if a war broke out between Dar al-Harb and Dar al-Islam, not to mention massive sabotage of military and civilian infrastructure and violent intifadas in Muslim-dominated cities throughout the West.

This is not to say that the Muslims would win a World War either. The victors of WWIII would be well-organised authoritarian states with small Muslim populations who would be prepared to be ruthless in keeping their Muslims in order. China springs to mind.

A New Cold War

The only option for defeating Islam is to undermine it in the same way we undermined communism — by a slow process of ideological warfare.

Altering the Spiritual and Material Cost/Benefits of Being a Muslim

Like other religions, Islam promises spiritual benefits from being a member of the cult — namely avoidance of hell and entry into paradise, which in Islam's case is a well-appointed brothel in the sky. But unlike other religions, Islam also offers material benefits in the here and now, for example immunity to normal laws, superior status to all non-Muslims (dhimmis) and sanctified rape and pillage where the victims are non-Muslims.

Adherence to any belief system usually has two components — faith and conformity. In Islam, as with communism, the forces of conformity are very strong and are imposed with murderous ruthlessness. Nevertheless, once the faith has gone, the habits of conformity will become an empty shell, which will eventually implode.

So we need to attack Islam on both fronts, by demonstrating that the spiritual benefits of the 'faith' are bogus — Islam is confidence trick set up by a ruthless megalomaniac, we also need to decrease the benefits of conformity by increasing the costs and reducing benefits of being a Muslim in the material world here and now. Read the rest>>>

Read more...

Internment Camps for Muslims

MANY COMMENTATORS have pointed out that in the Western world there is a growing "anti-Muslim sentiment." Often this observation is accompanied by the implication that, "this intolerance will lead to internment camps like those created during WWII for Japanese-American citizens." This implication is alarmist. It is fear-mongering. Nothing even close to that is happening, and nobody is even recommending it. But some things are already happening that are much more frightening and actually real: 270 million non-Muslims have died in the name of Islam. This is more deaths than has been caused by any other political system in history. The number of Muslim countries is increasing. Their degree of Islamization is increasing. Muslim influence in Western democracies is increasing. Muslim violence is increasing. The weak-kneed appeasement by non-Muslim politicians is increasing. The influence of Muslim countries at the U.N. is increasing. Muslim control of the world's economy is increasing. The number of mosques and madrassas being built and attended around the world is increasing. The overt display of Islamic supremacism worldwide is increasing. This is all happening now. It is not an alarmist creed about what might happen or where something might lead. It's already happening. So when you hear someone imply that criticism of Islamic doctrine will lead to internment camps, take a deep breath and begin setting the record straight.

Read more...