A Slow-Motion Conquest by Stealth


YESTERDAY a commenter named Reilly left an interesting comment on the article, The Terrifying Brilliance of Islam, and I wanted to share it with you:

I started thinking about Islam as a dangerous, self-replicating "meme" a few years back.

The catalyst was a Muslim colleague who tried to convince me Islam was tolerant. His evidence was a source claiming that the Koran demanded that Muslim men could marry Christian/Jewish women and were obliged by the Koran NOT to interfere with their wive's religion (thus allegedly proving how tolerant Koran is).

But... the same source also declared that:

1 - Children should follow the father's religion.
2 - And while Muslim men were allowed to marry infidels, Muslim women were not.

And then I thought how those rules interacted with each other.

And then I realized that, under a thin disguise of supposed "tolerance", these rules gave an evolutionary/competitive advantage to the Muslims over the long term (ie: birthrate/religon of children).

In reality, these rules didn't facilitate "tolerance". They simply facilitated a steady, slow-motion conquest by stealth.

Now I don't know the providence of these claimed traditions, but when even the evidence shown to me directly by a "Moderate Muslim" clearly shows a Supremacist mindset, this is not encouraging!

And so my suspicion began...

Thank you for laying this all out so clearly and easy-to-understand in a single article.


Damien 5:46 PM  

Citizen Warrior,

You're right this is hardly an example of tolerance.

gsw 2:06 AM  

Not a 'meme' a PRION.

(Proteinaceous Infectious particle also responsible for Creutzfeldt–Jakob and Mad Cow)

Anonymous 4:01 PM  

Yes, the rule allowing Muslim men to marry Christian and Jewish women, but prohibiting Muslim women from marrying any non-Muslim men (unless the man converts to Islam), is based on a combination of the Quran and the Hadith. In Islamic law, marriage between a non-Muslim man and Muslim woman is a capital (death penalty) offense. Even among Muslims in the U.K. today, if my memory serves me, about half of them believe that a Muslim woman should not be allowed to marry a non-Muslim man.

As for the Muslim husband tolerating the non-Muslim wife remaining non-Muslim, there are incentives mentioned in the Hadith for converting her, e.g., the man is promised "a double reward" from Allah if he can convert her. In addition, a grave penalty is threatened if she does not convert to Islam, as implied by Quran 66:6, which urges Muslims to save themselves and their families from the fire of hell, and 3:85 which declares unequivocally that Islam is the only acceptable religion.

(Not that all Muslims believe this, but many do).

Anonymous 10:59 AM  

When I was 19 I dated a man from the Muslim world who seemed completely Americanized in every way. One day he became worried that he had gotten me pregnant. I asked him "What would you do if I was?" Without hesitation he said he would send the baby to Iran to be raised by his family. That was quite the "Aha" moment for me.

Article Spotlight

One of the most unusual articles on CitizenWarrior.com is Pleasantville and Islamic Supremacism.

It illustrates the Islamic Supremacist vision by showing the similarity between what happened in the movie, Pleasantville, and what devout fundamentalist Muslims are trying to create in Islamic states like Syria, Pakistan, or Saudi Arabia (and ultimately everywhere in the world).

Click here to read the article.


All writing on CitizenWarrior.com is copyright © CitizenWarrior.com 2001-2099, all rights reserved.

  © Free Blogger Templates Columnus by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP