Identifying Jihadis in America


The following was written by Martel Sobieskey. When I first read it, I thought his suggestion was somewhat extreme, but the further into the article I read, the more sensible it seemed. I would be interested to know what you think about it (in the comments on this article).

Here it is, Sobieskey's "Identifying Jihadis in America:"

THE “SPECTER” of a nuclear bloodbath hangs over America, caused by a jihadist frenzy “foaming at the mouth” for our destruction. In order to “flush out” these nuclear maniacs, registration of the entire Muslim community in America is absolutely essential. The jihadist nuke-America agenda is not an idle threat, particularly since they have already acquired the weapons (see chapter 6 “Ignoring the Booming Nuclear Black Market” of Dr. Paul Williams’s book, Dunces of Doomsday).

Furthermore, experts agree that several thousand jihadists are living comfortably within the Muslim community, a combination of foreign jihadists and “homegrown” jihadists. The “homegrown” varieties are militant Muslims born and raised in the United States. (See Steven Emerson’s book, Jihad Incorporated: A Guide to Militant Islam in the US.)

The incendiary mix of foreign jihadists, “homegrown” jihadists, and nuclear weapons is an “ominous fuse ready to be lit” clearly warning that 500,000 Americans can be vaporized in an instant! This is no paranoid exaggeration, but a clear and present danger. F.B.I. Director, Robert Mueller, informed Ronald Kessler of News Max on May 15, 2007:

“. . . al-qaida’s paramount goal is clear: to detonate a nuclear device that would kill hundreds of thousands of Americans…We are going to be hit at some pointit’s just a question of when and to what extent.”
Failure to Protect Ourselves

The F.B.I. boss nearly guarantees we will suffer a jihadist nuclear attack, yet America remains paralyzed with self-complacency and disbelief. Have we become a nation of sheep ready for the slaughter?

The answer is yes; proven by our failure to enact the safeguards designed to protect us.

What must be done? We need to immediately implement the 1940 Alien Registration Act (Smith Act), and the 1798 Alien Enemies Act thereby registering all Muslims living in the USA and placing them under intense scrutiny.

This is no time to be polite, servile, or politically cowardly. We need to get the job done. According to Dr. Graham T. Allison of Harvard University: 500,000 killed would be the number of instant victims if a small (10 kiloton) nuke were set off in New York’s Times Square on a typical day. Dr. Allison gives the carnage a greater than 50% chance of happening.

Dr. Allison’s website at is crucially informative and brings home the harsh realities by providing a nuclear blast map which can be applied to your own city. His book, Nuclear Terrorism: The Ultimate Preventable Catastrophe, reveals that nuclear terrorism is inevitable if we continue on our present course, which in my opinion, is “floating” like a sitting duck waiting to get blown out of the water.

Why not break the impasse and protect ourselves? Registering Muslims will “throw a monkey wrench” into the jihadist plan, greatly reducing the probability of an attack. Please think deeply about this. Do you want to stop a nuclear attack or not?

The Precedent for Registration

In times of emergency all nations must monitor and register large groups of people, if they wish to survive. Unfortunately, a large percentage of Americans have lost their survival instinct, taking for granted their privileged lives which they mistakenly believe are “cost” free. They couldn’t be more wrong. Each American is obligated to share the “cost” of protecting our nation. Already, more than 4,000 soldiers have been killed, and a few million others are serving in the military, police and security community.

Compared to these heroes, registration is a minor inconvenience and minuscule price to pay. Shamefully, many Americans have become so selfishly spoiled and hubristic that they flatly refuse to suffer even the slightest inconvenience when asked to protect their nation. You will find these loathsome fools screaming “bloody murder” at the slightest hint of security measures such as registration of Muslims or the Patriot Act. No loyal American or reasonable person will behave so deplorably; such blatant irresponsibility emboldens the jihadists' nuke-America obsession. Registration proved very effective during WWII and is infinitely more necessary today.

Prior to World War II, a total of 4,741,971 aliens were registered in a period of 4 months, in order to uncover the enemies hiding within. President Roosevelt was prudent enough to make a “hot pursuit” of potential saboteurs. As a result, he successfully prevented internal attacks upon our homeland for the duration of WWII.

Today, it is imperative we follow Roosevelt’s example and register every Muslim 14 years or older. Each must be required to submit their photo, fingerprints, address, date and place of birth, physical description, occupation, employment history, arrest record, names of relatives in the USA and abroad, memberships in clubs, organizations, societies, and other pertinent data. The harshest penalties, for those who fail to register or lie, such as prison or deportation, must necessarily apply.

Michelle Malkin’s book, In Defense of Internment, provides a definitive report completely debunking the erroneous views of those opposing registration. Obviously, in times of great emergency, such as the present nuclear threat, national security takes precedence over the civil liberties of peacetime. Once again, ask yourself do you want to stop a nuclear attack on our homeland or not? Obviously, we must be proactive in preventing it.

The Alien Enemies Act of 1798 requires that when any predatory incursion is attempted or threatened against the United States, the President can make a public proclamation in order to single out and “round up the group” within which the enemies are hiding. This is exactly the course which needs to be pursued with the Muslim community today. It is a fact that the jihadists are hiding within our homeland and we must do whatever it takes to stop to them. It is well past time to “take off the gloves” and get down to the business of protecting ourselves. The noble adage — the price of freedom is eternal vigilance — has never been more relevant.


Nearly 50% of Americans are so weak-minded that the jihadist hate-America lobby believes that by simply calling us names like Islamophobe we will “shrink up” and let down our guard — enabling them to nuke us. So far they are 100% correct; nearly the entire Democratic Party refuses to defend our national security and remains adamantly in denial about the jihadist nuclear threat to our homeland. They are definitely suffering from the same mental disorder that afflicted Neville Chamberlain when he believed “romancing” and appeasing Adolph Hitler would bring peace to the world.

But the facts cry out loudly; never has there been a more urgent need to single out a group of people. Registration will serve as a much-needed litmus test, sorting out the elusive moderate Muslims from the militants.

Certainly, anyone who protests registration is not a moderate Muslim but an enemy to the United States’ national security. If you believe such opinion to be impolite, then most likely you have failed to “face the fact” that this is the age of jihadist nuclear terrorism.

Please think deeply: The jihadists possess an extremely entrenched homicidal mania and religious fervor to nuke us and their plan is well underway. This point cannot be overemphasized.

A Million Times More Dangerous

One of the world’s richest men, insurance magnate, Warren Buffet believes a nuclear terrorist attack on American soil is going to occur. At an annual meeting of Berkshire Hathaway he stated, “We’re going to have something of a major nuclear event in this countryIt will happen — whether it will happen in 10 years or 10 minutes, or 50 years…it’s virtually a certainty.”

Today the threat of a jihadist nuclear attack on American soil is a million times more dangerous than the threat by conventional weapons during WWII. But things get even worse. The jihadists plan to nuke 7 American cities simultaneously and kill 4 million Americans. This is a sinister goal well-documented by Dr. Paul Williams. They will do just that if we fail to prevent it.

What is wrong with us? We registered 5 million people prior to WWII, but now, facing a nuclear weapon, we remain inert. Have we become our own worst enemy? The answer is yes.

Let’s compare the gravity of the situation. Today less than a dozen nuclear jihadists can vaporize 500,000 Americans in an instant. On the other hand, during WWII 350,000 Americans were killed during a 4-year period, and it took several million enemy soldiers armed with enormous amounts of weaponry to do so. Without doubt the risk we now face is astounding, beyond belief, and makes WWII seem infinitesimal.

Consequently, we can no longer afford to give a “religious pass” to the Muslim community because the majority of them are not nuclear jihadists. To the contrary, the severity of the nuclear threat is so far off the charts, we are forced to subject all Muslims to the utmost scrutiny in order to weed out the bad apples hiding amongst them. There is no other choice.


Anyone who disagrees with registration of the Muslims in America is a suicidal fool if not an outright enemy to American national security. Such chastisement is well justified because the consequences of failing to act are apocalyptic. “One bad apple spoils the whole bunch” especially when it’s a nuclear apple. We must take out all the stops in order to thwart the jihadist dream of massacring us on our own soil.

So enormous is the jihadist nuke-America threat that the Department of Homeland Security developed a special department called the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO) on April 15, 2005. Well done indeed! One of their strategic objectives is to establish situational awareness through information sharing and analysis. The registration of Muslims will greatly enhance and facilitate this objective, proving to be the key ingredient for success. On the other hand, continuing the status quo of non-registration will neutralize, if not forecast a failure (which means we get nuked).

Registering Muslims is obligatory for preventing a jihadist nuclear blast on American soil as well as the other types of WMD’s. It is the epitome of negligence not to implement all methods of prevention. Remember 9/11 anyone? Let not history repeat itself by making a commission — after the debacle — in order to decide what should have been done to prevent it. Let’s do the right thing now!

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Martel Sobieskey has 36 years research experience in the field of religious conditioning and its relationship to warfare. He is greatly alarmed that American politicians, military commanders, educators, journalists, intelligence analysts, security and police personnel have failed to comprehend the deeply entrenched jihadist conditioning inherent in all of Islam — moderates included.


Matty 6:27 PM  

I would have to think more about the registration of all muslims - it is a big step with a big brush. I have read other suggestions such as registering mosques and monitoring them to ensure they are not preaching jihadist principals. Identifying islamic concessions and denying their implementation or consideration would be a required step as well.

We are not doing as good of a job denying islamic concessions and ensuring their principals are not preached. Is the koran a seditious document that should be treated as such? Perhaps restrictions should be put on the koran until it is changed to make it actually reflect what some call the religion of peace. I have not heard or seen this proposed yet.

The bottomline is registering all muslims seems, without further consideration, a big step. We need, first, to do the little things and perhaps then the broad brush would not need to come out.

Citizen Warrior 8:44 PM  

Mat, I agree that the slow and more gradual way is how it will probably happen, but I don't know if that's necessarily the best way. There is a time-pressure here. I was just reading in The Week Magazine (which is a mainstream publication with no history of fear-mongering) published an interesting statistic recently:

"About 250 thefts of nuclear material were reported around the world this year, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA chief Mohammed ElBaradei called the number of thefts 'disturbingly high' and said most of the material is never recovered."

We already know al Qaeda has actively been seeking nuclear weapons for years.

So the time urgency is what makes me hesitate to endorse the gradual method.

Of course, a proposal like that (registering all Muslims) would be extremely controversial, and organizations like CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood would attack it vehemently. But would a patriotic American Muslim be bothered by it?

If there was a new Scottish-American supremacist organization plotting to overthrow the U.S. government and I had to register because I am part Scottish, I don't think it would bother me. In fact, I would probably be glad to do it and glad the government was doing SOMETHING about it to protect the rights of all of us. Those rights, freedom of the press, human rights, equality, etc., would disappear without the government actively protecting them.

If there are any patriotic Muslims reading this, I would appreciate it if you weighed in on this issue here in the comments. Would you be offended to have to register? Bothered? Outraged? Or would it be okay with you? If so, why?

Ben 10:03 PM  

Unfortunately, registration of Muslims is a non-starter. Islam is considered to be a religion, not a hostile nationality.

Some of them are Egyptians, some are Kuwaitis, some are Saudis, others are Lebanese. None of those are nations officially at war with the U.S.A.

There are also some Muslims, both naturalized and born here, who are citizens.

Granted, Islam considers itself to be a nation (Ummah al-Islamiyya), but the Caliphate was dissolved after WWI.

The war being prosecuted against us is primarily institutional, not nationalist.

Sheep can be sorted from goats visually. How do you sort Mujahideen from their more passive brethren? What of those who contributed Zakat to the Holy Land Foundation for transmission to Hamas? They threw no bombs; discharged no fire arms, but they supported Jihad none the less.

Islam is predatory; mercenary & militant, not passive. I suggest reading Surah Al-Anfal & Surah Al-Taubah. Those Surahs are confirmed & exemplified by the Jihad & Expedition books of the four major hadith collections.

Those ayat & ahadith are confirmed by inclusion in Sharia, codified in Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.

For those to indolent to peruse the translated documents, the most relevant ayat & ahadith together with the tafsir which explain their obvious meanings have been compiled, with a substantial quotation of Reliance O9, into an e-book which you can download, read and search. You can find it by searching for its name: EgregiousAyat.chm. Links are provided in the book for context & verification.

Allah commands his slaves to make war upon disbelievers; pagans and "people of the book". Moe said that the war would continue until Judgment Day. Muslims who refuse to participate when called to fight are condemned to Hellfire as hypocrites. Muslims not called to fight are obliged to finance the war and support the families of those who have joined the Jihad.

Jihad is carried out with the heart, tongue, pen & purse as well as the sword.

You can not determine, by sight or smell, whether any given Muslim is planning, plotting or preparing to engage in a violent, destructive act. Nor can you determine whether he supports, admires or respects those who are so engaged. Neither can you predict which presently passive Muslim will become radicalized in some future period.

"Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion nor prohibiting the free exercise of the same. ..."

The free exercise of Islam requires making war on Kuffar, killing them, raping their widows, selling their orphans into slavery and confiscating their real & personal property. Sane, able bodied, free adult male Muslims not thus engaged are in sin, and condemned to Hellfire. It is required that they attack at least once in every year.

The obligation is communal: fard kifaya unless Muslim land is invaded or insufficient manpower has been raised for a conquest, in which cases it becomes fard ayn.

Allah says "fight them", "fight those who"; "O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn "[8:39, 9:29, 9:123].

There is a conflict here. Does anyone perceive it? Congress is forbidden to prohibit the free exercise of religion. Islam requires actions which directly impair our rights to life,liberty, property and security.

Jihad can not be prohibited by law. A constitutional amendment is required to remove the umbrella of first amendment protection from Islam. Amendment 28 has been proposed by Pedestrian Infidel.

An online petition in support of the proposed amendment has been posted. A blog post including the most significant arguments for the amendment has been posted here. Only 89 people have endorsed the petition. Few know about its existence. Links to other related petitions can be found at Crusader's Armory.

Registration of Muslims would accomplish little and is unconstitutional. You can no more register Muslims than Catholics or Mormons. You must amend the Constitution first. If you go to that trouble, you may as well go all the way and deport them all, at the same time prohibiting their entry. Only then will be secure from domestic attacks. There is no alternative.

If you will wait for Islam to reform; for the Qur'an to be edited, you will wait until Hell freezes over. The Qur'an is Allah's divine, perfected word which neither changes nor can be changed.
My flier "Can Islam be Reformed?" provides the details.

Article Spotlight

One of the most unusual articles on is Pleasantville and Islamic Supremacism.

It illustrates the Islamic Supremacist vision by showing the similarity between what happened in the movie, Pleasantville, and what devout fundamentalist Muslims are trying to create in Islamic states like Syria, Pakistan, or Saudi Arabia (and ultimately everywhere in the world).

Click here to read the article.


All writing on is copyright © 2001-2099, all rights reserved.

  © Free Blogger Templates Columnus by 2008

Back to TOP