What Duty Do We Have To Those Hostile To Our Culture?

Tuesday

The following is an excerpt from an article in Jihad Watch by Hugh Fitzgerald:

If you keep your wits about you, and finally conclude that something is very wrong with how our leaders approach the subject of Islam, their public pronouncements after each new Muslim outrage either pollyannish or pusillanimous, you may well undertake on your own to study Islamic doctrine, and to find out how that doctrine explains the practice, as shown by the history of Islamic conquest, of many different non-Muslim peoples, in time over the past 1350 years, in space from the Iberian Peninsula to the East Indies. Don’t expect institutions of higher learning to help you; when it comes to Islam, they have been thoroughly corrupted, by money, or by the desire of professors not to offend but to parrot the party line.

But you keep at it. You read, you visit certain websites (as the one you are reading now). And if you do that, then the Jihad News of the day will not confuse you; you will be able to fit it into the larger history of Islam. And you will know why, when some high-ranking Christian cleric, as part of his Interfaith Outreach, offers this slippery solipsism — All religions are a force for good. Islam is a religion. Therefore, Islam is a force for good. — he is wrong, and you will be able to adduce the textual support for your conclusion. You might even begin to ask some delicate questions: who is to decide what is a “religion” and what distinguishes a “religion” from a “cult”— and is it possible that we call Islam a “religion” only because we don’t know what else to call it?

But then what? After you have achieved such knowledge, what forgiveness for those non-Muslims who continue to refuse to see Islam steadily and whole? You have a perfect right to be downcast, even despairing, at news of what is happening in Germany, in Sweden, in France, but you also have a duty — owed to yourself and to your own, imperiled, Western civilization — not to give in but to keep trying to inform and enlighten others. You have no Munich to point to, no single Grand Appeasement. Rather, there are a hundred sundry appeasements. It can be the Bishop of London calling on fellow clerics to “grow beards” in order to put Muslims at ease. It can be the prayer rooms in schools, halal food in prisons and schools, single-sex hours at the municipal pools. You can make your own list.

We are living in a time, because of Islam, of mass disorientation and topsy-turvydom. You have to keep your wits about you. You are suavely told that Europeans simply must not oppose Muslim migration. Why not? Why can’t we ask that question? What duty do we have to those whose entire history has been one of hostility toward, and conquest of, non-Muslims? And hasn’t the West already tried to be as accommodating as it can? Point out that there are already tens of millions of Muslims living in Europe, in lands they have been taught to regard as Dar al-Harb. They are there to take advantage of well-run and prosperous societies, to pocket all that they can — the free or subsidized housing, health care, education, and even family allowances — but not to jettison Islam. They are not there to “integrate” into non-Muslim societies, but instead are obligated to engage, using whatever means are available and effective, in the Jihad or struggle to ensure the ultimate triumph and dominance of Islam, and rule by Muslims.

Non-Muslims find this a fantastic goal, but a large part of the globe succumbed to Muslim rule in this way a long time ago. A million Muslims settled, last year, in Germany alone; millions more are on the way to Europe; among these migrants are many who, it has been reluctantly conceded by the authorities, have already been involved in attacks on non-Muslims; no Western politician of the mainstream dares to discuss the significance of the Muslim division of the world between Dar al-Harb and Dar al-Islam, and between Believer and Unbeliever; those in public life who call for a halt to Muslim migration — what is assuredly the most obvious measure of self-protection — are immediately demonized for that commonsensical suggestion and politically placed beyond the pale.

So share what you’ve learned; go to those mosque open-houses and spoil the proceedings with a Qur’anic quotation or two that will upset your hosts but which they will be unable to deny; call into those talk-shows with similar material, write those letters to the papers, engage in guerrilla warfare on the blogs. When you learned about Islam, you did not make the world any easier for yourself, just easier to comprehend. And in so learning about Islam, you should recognize that you now have a responsibility to share that knowledge with others, many of whom have shown they will be willfully resistant to it. But you have taken on this task. If not you — who?

Read the whole article: The Task You Have Taken Upon Yourself.

8 comments:

Walter Sieruk 10:50 AM  

Just about the some of the jihad happenings concerning last year and this year. Those two jihadist murders in the city of San Bernardio or the larger number of brutal vicious murdering jihadist thugs in the of Paris during the night of November 13, 2015. Along with all the ruthless cruel jihad murders committed the those hideous fiendish jihadists, in the lands of Syria and Iraq, who compose the brutal and deadly jihad entity ISIS. All those Muslims who are also jihadists are so very bloodthirsty, murderous and destructive that they are similar,in character, to the heinous villains described in the Bible. Which reads "Their feet are swift to shed blood: Destruction and misery are in their ways: and the way of peace have they not known." Romans 3:15-17. [K.J.V.]

Walter Sieruk 10:41 AM  

Of the many murderous jihad entities such as Al Qaeda, ISIS Boko Haram, Al Shabaab, Hamas,Hezbollah, P.I.J. etc. Such dangerous and deadly Islamic terror groups are actually following the instruction of violence and killing that is part of the teachings of the "holy book" of Islam ,the Koran. Examples of this violent and killing instruction may be found in the Koran in 4:89. 5:33 9:5,111,123 47:4. So don't let the apologists for Islam fool you. Those brutal, cruel violent and murdering jihad entities as those just named are actual Islamic organizations. Likewise, the members who compose those deadly jihad entities are real Muslims. Nevertheless, there are some who might ,understandably, wonder and then ask "Just how can those members who make up those jihadist groups ,being so very religious, also be so ruthless, bloodthirsty, malicious and murdering ?" The answer to that question is found in the Bible. For the Bible teaches that there are some people who are so extremely heartless, malice-filled, cruel ,callous and dangerous because they have had "their conscience seared with a hot iron." First Timothy 4:2. The "hot iron" in this case is Islam.

Robandrews33304 8:50 AM  

Muslims are doing the same kind of things Christians were doing three hundred or so years ago. They have yet to have the scientific and democratic revolutions we had in the 17th and 18th centuries. Christianity would still be burning witches if it wasn't for science. And the Anmerican and Frence revolutions taught us to live in accord with each other.

But I am hoping the 'Arab spring' will bring the same changes to the middle east. But will it be too late?! The French and American revolutions took at least 80 to get it right.

Zackery Martel 6:30 PM  

Robandrews33304,

http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2008/12/putting-deaths-by-jihadis-into.html

http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2009/02/christianity-is-just-as-bad.html

Walter Sieruk 8:45 AM  

Islamic history is rather interesting. It helps ,in part, explain about the many Islamic terror attacks that have occurred in the world today. One type of violence and deadly jihad is the murderous actions of suicide/homicide bombing attack. Many times such jihad attack murders are performed by male Muslim/ jihadist who is as deluded as he is dangerous and deadly. That is he was under strong delusion, in this case strong Islamic /Koranic delusion. Nevertheless, being under delusion is no excuse for doing evil. That he was deluded so deluded that he must of thought of his murderous bombing as a “martyrdom operation.” This Muslim who was also a jihadist must have had really believed that he would obtain for himself a paradise with many virgins, houris, in it for him if he died for the cause of Islam in the jihad as a “martyr.” As the Koran teaches in, for example, in 44:54. 55:56. 78:31. That jihadist /Muslim found out the hard way that he was taught total falsehood from the Koran. For after he died in committing that jihad attack he had a very harsh reality check. For instead of finding himself in any kind of paradise, with or without virgins, he found himself tragically suffering in the fires of an awful place that the Bible call hell. As the Bible teaches that a murderer “shall not inherit the kingdom of God.” Galatians 5: 21. In addition, those Muslim clerics, such as the imams who indoctrinate this story of a doctrine from the Koran of a lustful paradises of the flesh with many virgins into the hearts and minds of others. The Bible explains and warns about such false religious teachers who ingrain such a religious /story lust filled place of the flesh in to the beliefs and thought of other. For of such false teachers the Bible in Second Peter 2:18. reads “For they speak great swelling words of vanity, they allure through the lusts of the flesh…” Moreover, the Bible also warns against listening to and believing in unproven and invalid religious stories. No matter just how enticing those religious stories may be. As the Bible warns against giving “heed to fables…” First Timothy 1:4. As for the jihadist with his Islamic pipedream in the Koranic story /doctrine of a place with virgins, such a man is in great contrast to the Christian who had the reality of Second Peter 1:16. Which reads “For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ…” [K.J.V.]

Ernesto Ribeiro 8:36 AM  

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/02/01/foxs-rupert-murdoch/

http://newsbleat.com/2016/02/01/where-the-crap-meets-the-fan-fox-news-is-islamist/



“Anti-Trump Saudi Prince Tied to Both Rupert Murdoch And Hillary Aide (Huma Abedin)” is the headline this morning on Breitbart. “Fox mogul Rupert Murdoch is partnered in multiple media ventures with Saudi Arabian Prince Alwaweed Bin Talal, including an Arabic religious TV network with a direct tie to Hillary Clinton’s top aide Huma Abedin.”


No wonder!!! Rupert Murdoch owns the biggest TV station in Turkey, something I’ve known since he bought it, but this, that he has partner, an Anti-American Saudi prince oil billionaire? That’s news. This Prince Alaweed owns the Al-Resalah TV network, and one of the members of his Supreme Advisory board for his company is Dr. Abdullah Naseef, President of World Muslim Congress and President of Forum For Social Studies. Dr. Naseef is the longtime benefactor of top Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin’s family business, the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs. This links Huma Abedin directly to some of the most fervent Anti-West, Anti-American people in Saudi Arabia.


Huma Abedin isn’t just a Muslime, she’s directly involved in the effort to destroy us, she’s Hillary Clinton’s closest friend and she’s deeply involved in the running of our government. Her only expertise is in Muslime affairs. That’s it, promoting Muslime goals, promoting Islam. No other training. And she’s Hillary Clinton’s top advisor?



Hillary Clinton, who was our Secretary of State, who stood by the side of our President and did his bidding?



“We have a strategic alliance with Rupert Murdoch for sure and I have been with him for the last 15 or 20 years,” Alwaleed said. “My backing of Rupert Murdoch is definitely unwavering.”



“The connection between Alwaleed, Murdoch, Abedin, Hillary Clinton and Saudi Arabia are troubling given a number of recent events. Prince Alwaleed is boasting about his role in impacting U.S. elections.”



“CNN reported in 2008 that “donations to the William J. Clinton Foundation include amounts of $10 million to $25 million from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.” “Huma Abedin was hired as a consultant to the William J. Clinton Foundation after Clinton left her role as Secretary of State.”



So this promoter of Islam and hater of democracy is still being paid by the Clintons with money from Prince Alaweed.


“Abedin is also at the center of Hillary Clinton’s private email server scandal.”

Anonymous 8:02 PM  

When Islam conquered Europe twice before the people of Europe were successful in pushing Islam back. However today, the will to fight back does not seem to be there. There is too much political correctness and the world's elite is working tirelessly in line with the jihadists. Many of us are busy informing our peers about the dangers of Islam but what else can we do?

Zackery Martel 2:35 AM  

Informing our peers is number one. But there's much more you can do:

whatyoucandoaboutislam.com

Copyright

All writing on CitizenWarrior.com is copyright © CitizenWarrior.com 2001-2099, all rights reserved.

Article Spotlight

One of the most unusual articles on CitizenWarrior.com is Pleasantville and Islamic Supremacism.

It illustrates the Islamic Supremacist vision by showing the similarity between what happened in the movie, Pleasantville, and what devout fundamentalist Muslims are trying to create in Islamic states like Syria, Pakistan, or Saudi Arabia (and ultimately everywhere in the world).

Click here to read the article.


Citizen Warrior Heroes

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Visit the blog: Citizen Warrior Heroes.

No More Concessions to Islam

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Visit the blog: Concessions to Islam.

  © Free Blogger Templates Columnus by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP