The Facts of Islam Alone Can Open Someone's Eyes

Wednesday

Damon Whitsell, the creator of The Religion of Conquest, published an interesting article about his own experiences trying to convince a friend's son that Islam is not a religion of peace. Whitsell admits he didn't do a very good persuasion job, and when you read their exchange, you have to agree with him. He's hard on the kid and too self-righteous, among other things.

However, he gets in some good points, gets a few facts to penetrate, and after the kid stopped talking to Whitsell for eight months, he came back after he looked into Islam on his own, and had to admit Whitsell was right. It's a triumph of the facts.

And it illustrates the point that you don't really have to convince someone Islam is a dangerous ideology. You only have to convince someone to look into it. The true nature of Islamic doctrine speaks for itself without any emphasis or embellishment on your part. This is good news. It means your mission is easier than you thought.

Read the blow-by-blow transcript of Whitsell's interaction with his friend's son here: With Facts I Helped Open Someone's Eyes to the Dangers of Islam (You Can Too).

6 comments:

Anonymous 11:17 AM  

Thanks for this post. It is great inspiration to not give up and to keep planting seeds of information in the minds of others, even if you don't think they are listening. I love to come to Citizen Warrior and read an article like this when I am feeling discouraged about my efforts.

Pray Hard 12:05 PM  

Once one has seen it, it can't be unseen, but that's just the way it is.

Robandrews33304 2:22 PM  

The Terrorist tha took over the Radisson hotel in Mali made people: "recite verses from the qu'ran to prove if they were Muslim".--from BBC World News.

So radical Muslims are supposed have nothing to do with Islam.Are they?

Charles Black 7:42 PM  

This article is an important reminder that isn't just the information that has to be right and also the delivery of information. As Groucho Marx once said "Learn from other's mistakes there isn't enough time to make them all".

Unknown 8:25 AM  

Can I also suggest using these sources.

European Court of Human Rights:
"Noting that the Welfare Party had pledged to set up a regime based on sharia law, the Court found that sharia was incompatible with the fundamental principles of democracy as set forth in the Convention. It considered that “sharia, which faithfully reflects the dogmas and divine rules laid down by religion, is stable and invariable. Principles such as pluralism in the political sphere or the constant evolution of public freedoms have no place in it”. According to the Court, it was difficult to declare one’s respect for democracy and human rights while at the same time supporting a regime based on sharia, which clearly diverged from Convention values, particularly with regard to its criminal law and criminal procedure, its rules on the legal status of women and the way it intervened in all spheres of private and public life in accordance with religious precepts."
Annual Report 2003

http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Annual_report_2003_ENG.pdf
https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Research_report_application_islamic_law_ENG.PDF


Council of Europe 2016 - follow-up report:
In this study I shall be looking at the general principles of Sharia law...
Sharia law is understood as being ‘the path to be followed’, that is, the ‘law’ to be obeyed by every Muslim...
The prescriptions of Sharia law originate in the Qur’an, held to be a work that is ‘perfect and unchangeable’...The Qur’an constitutes the primary source of law...

In Islamic family law, men have authority over women. Surah 4:34 states: ‘Men have authority over women because God has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because God has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and forsake them in beds apart, and beat them. Then if they obey you, take no further action against them. Surely God is high, supreme.’
While wives clearly have a duty of fidelity, husbands do not....

In criminal cases, cruel, inhuman and degrading punishments are authorised by Sharia law, including death by stoning, beheading and hanging, amputation of limbs, and flogging.
Apostasy results, firstly, in the apostate’s civil death, with the estate passing to the heirs, and, secondly, in the apostate’s execution if he or she does not recant.
Lastly, non-Muslims do not have the same rights as Muslims in civil and criminal [sharia] law
http://www.assembly.coe.int/Committee/JUR/ajdoc282016.pdf


Resolution 2253 - voted for by 21 European states:
"The Assembly considers that the various Islamic declarations on human rights, adopted since the 1980s, while being more religious than legal, fail to reconcile Islam with universal human rights, especially insofar as Sharia is their unique source of reference."
http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=25353

https://pace.coe.int/en/files/12972/html

Walter Sieruk 11:02 AM  

It’s a good idea not to take at face value the claim that the word Islam means “peace.” For example, the ENCARTA WORLD ENGLISH DICTIONARY copyright 1999 defines Islam as “submission” based on the word “aslama” meaning “he surrendered.” Given the definition it’s an odd phenomenon that after about fourteen hundred years starting on September 12, 2001 the meaning changed from “submission” to “peace.” It’s very well known that if the police are questioning someone and he changes his story something is wrong. Nevertheless, when it comes to Islam no one gets suspicious of the change. The jihadists brag that they will win the war against the West by using the Western ignorance and naive gullible mindset on the subject of Islam against us. It seems that they do have some basis in that claim since so many Westerners are beguiled by the Muslim disinformation campaign.

Article Spotlight

One of the most unusual articles on CitizenWarrior.com is Pleasantville and Islamic Supremacism.

It illustrates the Islamic Supremacist vision by showing the similarity between what happened in the movie, Pleasantville, and what devout fundamentalist Muslims are trying to create in Islamic states like Syria, Pakistan, or Saudi Arabia (and ultimately everywhere in the world).

Click here to read the article.


Copyright

All writing on CitizenWarrior.com is copyright © CitizenWarrior.com 2001-2099, all rights reserved.

  © Free Blogger Templates Columnus by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP