tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3503986435514614182.post5800557341954543964..comments2024-02-18T23:52:40.165-08:00Comments on Citizen Warrior: Eleven Reasons to Reject Sharia Law in Any FormCitizen Warriorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06265844262699107352noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3503986435514614182.post-67429608107242284592016-06-11T06:35:56.952-07:002016-06-11T06:35:56.952-07:00Jason,
An even more fubdemental reason to deny Sha...Jason,<br />An even more fubdemental reason to deny Shariah law is the belief that it is the law given down by God almighty.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3503986435514614182.post-5822292025539826672015-05-07T19:10:08.174-07:002015-05-07T19:10:08.174-07:00Sharia should not be permitted for various reasons...Sharia should not be permitted for various reasons. Many people cite the actual rules of Sharia, drawing attention to its barbaric nature. This is a valid argument, but I would like to present a more fundamental argument against Sharia.<br /><br />People are used to thinking that in a democracy, the leaders are accountable to the people. It is important to understand that in a liberal democracy (a democracy is not really a democracy unless it is a liberal one), the laws themselves are accountable to the people. If a law is bad, we can protest it. We can demand that it be changed. The government can examine the law, and if it is indeed bad, the law can be changed. This can also apply to laws that are out of date. A law may have been useful and valid 100 years ago, but with changing technology and cultural attitudes, it may no longer work. <b>A democratic legal system has the ability to evolve as society evolves in order to meet it changing needs</b>.<br /><br />Sharia does not work this way. Because it is deemed perfect, it does not ever change. It cannot evolve as society evolves and cannot change to meet society's changing needs. Furthermore, laws that were just simply bad to begin with cannot be fixed because of the belief that they are perfect. <b>Sharia is an archaic legal code that will forever be an archaic legal code</b>.<br /><br />I consider that to be the main reason why Sharia should be rejected, above and beyond any judgement of the contents of Sharia.Jasonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3503986435514614182.post-78735627301409293522015-05-03T18:49:04.767-07:002015-05-03T18:49:04.767-07:00@Sitara
Only Moe could interpret his invention. ...@Sitara <br /><br />Only Moe could interpret his invention. His interpretation is found in hadith and sira. I suggest that you read Sahih Bukhari. <br /><br />Muslims having difficulty interpreting the Koran need a Tafsir. Tafsir Ibn kathir and Tafsir al-Jalalayn are two of the most popular and accepted. <br /><br />Everyone else needing to know the true nature of Islam need only read QV 8.1-5, 8.41, 8.67, 9.5, 9.29, 9.111, 9.120, 9.123 and Bukhari's books of Jihad, Khumus & Expedition. <br /><br />For the short course: <br /><br />https://www.scribd.com/doc/220586952/What-s-Wrong-With-Islam-Muslims<br /><br />and <br /><br />https://www.scribd.com/doc/227418623/Islam-s-Mercenary-Mission-Updated<br /><br />The author disclims responsibility for garments and furniture fouled by Muslims reading those documents. Benhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01975775791961343435noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3503986435514614182.post-84552196202359250672015-05-03T18:28:14.596-07:002015-05-03T18:28:14.596-07:00Keller did not translate the laws of slavery in Re...Keller did not translate the laws of slavery in Reliance, asserting they were anachronistic. But see o9.<br />12, which says captured women and children are enslaved by default. <br /><br />The first volume of Hedaya preserves the rules of slavery. Download it from archive.org and dig in. <br /><br />In the matter of Jihad: see Reliance o9.0 for the definition, 9.1 for the obligation to perform it in every year, 9.8 & 9.9 for what the caliph does about it. <br /><br />In Hedaya, Jihad is covered in Book IX or Volume II, beginning on page 140. It will fill in some gaps for you. <br /><br />For a detailed look at the laws of Jihad, see "The Book Of Jihad", which you can download from the archive. Just reading the table of contents should make your blood boil. If you had trouble understanding Reliance 09.1, then turn to page 18 of BOJ for a better statement of Imam Al-Shafi'i's infamous fatwa. <br /><br />If you will Google Scribd + "Kab Ashraf" you will find 31 pdf files, many with quotes from and links to those books. See esp. the "Book List" And the annotations of Hedaya 2.140 & 141.Benhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01975775791961343435noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3503986435514614182.post-66981907570246965912015-05-03T10:39:20.628-07:002015-05-03T10:39:20.628-07:00One good reason ,that even stands alone, that Shar...One good reason ,that even stands alone, that Sharia Law should be rejected for and by America is that we have something that is far better, as in very much superior the Sharia law. It's the US Constitution. For this is America.Not Iran. Walter Sieruknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3503986435514614182.post-27442084850324186782015-05-03T01:24:39.681-07:002015-05-03T01:24:39.681-07:00"And such of your slaves as seek a writing of..."And such of your slaves as seek a writing of emancipation, give them such writing, if you find that there is good and honesty in them"<br /><br />I love it when Muslims offer easily refuted lies. They think we're idiots, which to be fair we are according to the Quran.<br /><br />The Quran says that non-Muslims are by definition dishonest and not good. Any Muslim who believes what the Quran says (and any Muslim who doesn't is apostate and subject to summary execution) therefore cannot emancipate their non-Muslim slaves.Bob Smithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05893743800467576124noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3503986435514614182.post-79254653532130482872015-05-03T00:46:50.786-07:002015-05-03T00:46:50.786-07:00It's time for tit for tat!
I don't know...It's time for <b>tit for tat</b>! <br /> <br />I don't know the proper English word for that but if moslems would like to be treated as equal than the way they are going to be handled with is the same as what they do to others. <br /> <br />I guess they would not like it, and furthermore why would we see them as if they would have the same value?vanhetgoorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00157486761407746006noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3503986435514614182.post-6292900949311087212015-05-02T22:09:42.558-07:002015-05-02T22:09:42.558-07:00It is very difficult for a Muslim especially in a ...It is very difficult for a Muslim especially in a Muslim majority county who want to leave Islam as he/she will be killed if other Muslims become aware of their intention. But there is a hope. By adapting the Sanatana way of life they can overcome their dilemma as by adapting the Sanatana way of life they need not change their name, diet, customs or undergo purification ceremonies; or say prayer in an alien language or visit places of worship; all these which attract the attention of their neighbours. See http://sanatanaparishad.blogspot.inMathiasnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3503986435514614182.post-29915393033834811382013-04-22T11:22:42.997-07:002013-04-22T11:22:42.997-07:00This article has some serious mistakes.
1. It cla...This article has some serious mistakes.<br /><br />1. It claims that slaves can be whipped. this is false, you are not allowed to strike slaves in any manner at all:<br /><br />“Whoever slaps his slave or beats him, his expiation is to manumit him.” Sahih Muslim (1657).<br /><br />2. If a slave requests freedom, then his master must grant it:<br /><br />“And such of your slaves as seek a writing of emancipation, give them such writing, if you find that there is good and honesty in them. And give them something (yourselves) out of the wealth of Allaah which He has bestowed upon you”[Qur'an 24:33] <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3503986435514614182.post-14393052709307988612013-03-31T19:38:39.732-07:002013-03-31T19:38:39.732-07:00Islam is, and has always been an international Maf...Islam is, and has always been an international Mafia-type crime syndicate with a "religious front." It began and continues to be a plundering organization, which has enslaved, raped, pillaged, murdered its way through history. Islamic ideology is totalitarian, bigoted, hateful, and reflects the exact image of its creator/inventor Mohammad, who legitimized the basest lusts of the man's depraved nature. Islam is totally incompatible with any free nation, especially the United States of America. Free nations do not have time to sort out good ones from the bad ones. Fact is, ALL Muslims are obligated to be involved in Jihad at some level. The objective is the same_ to overthrow and enslave the host nations where they live, to replace the laws that protect human freedom, with Sharia law, which destroys human freedom.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3503986435514614182.post-12581075535804703282011-05-31T10:11:16.488-07:002011-05-31T10:11:16.488-07:00Barbaric heathens.Barbaric heathens.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3503986435514614182.post-86298052884576514962009-03-17T10:07:00.000-07:002009-03-17T10:07:00.000-07:00Sitara,I have EVERY right to interpret Islam for m...Sitara,<BR/>I have EVERY right to interpret Islam for myself. I don't care what Islam tells a Muslim about his personal salvation. But when Islam discusses how to treat NON-Muslims, then I have every right and obligation to STOP it in its tracks and defend myself, my culture and my nation. Have you read the quran, sira and hadith? You are full of self-deception and/or taqiyya.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3503986435514614182.post-51633803313605590732008-01-10T22:24:00.000-08:002008-01-10T22:24:00.000-08:00Sitara, I'm not exactly sure what you are saying i...Sitara, I'm not exactly sure what you are saying in most of your message, but I think you are demonstrating many of the points the author of the article was trying to make.<BR/><BR/>I DO understand what you said in your last sentence. And I believe the article was written for non-Muslims. It is not "interpreting Islam for Muslims." The point in publishing this kind of thing is to alert non-Muslims to the situation so they will be better able to defend themselves against an <A HREF="http://citizenwarrior2.blogspot.com/search/label/Islamic%20invasion%20of%20the%20West" REL="nofollow">Islamic invasion</A>. And to help non-Muslims clarify exactly what they need to protect and why.<BR/><BR/>If you are looking for a web site that will help Muslims interpret Islam, there are many such web sites available on the net, but this is most definitely NOT one of them.Citizen Warriorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10929989662770543301noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3503986435514614182.post-2796528442552022232008-01-10T06:16:00.000-08:002008-01-10T06:16:00.000-08:00I have lived in UK for the past 42 years, accordin...I have lived in UK for the past 42 years, according to the Islamic Sharia Law - all faiths have sharia law (God's laws)without any difficulty. The author seems to be misguided and misinformed. There is no doubt that not all Muslims, like people of other faiths and world views, have not lived up to the high standards that Islam imposes, but that does not mean that it is the faith which is at fault, rather the misguided Muslims. May I suggest that the author differentiates between Muslims and Islam. The author has no right to interpret Islam for the Muslims, we need to struggle to do that for ourselves, thank you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com