tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3503986435514614182.post5161830901459146707..comments2024-02-18T23:52:40.165-08:00Comments on Citizen Warrior: Identifying Jihadis in AmericaCitizen Warriorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06265844262699107352noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3503986435514614182.post-4873243067289472332008-11-26T22:03:00.000-08:002008-11-26T22:03:00.000-08:00Unfortunately, registration of Muslims is a non-st...Unfortunately, registration of Muslims is a non-starter. Islam is considered to be a religion, not a hostile nationality. <BR/><BR/>Some of them are Egyptians, some are Kuwaitis, some are Saudis, others are Lebanese. None of those are nations officially at war with the U.S.A. <BR/><BR/>There are also some Muslims, both naturalized and born here, who are citizens. <BR/><BR/>Granted, Islam considers itself to be a nation (Ummah al-Islamiyya), but the Caliphate was dissolved after WWI. <BR/><BR/>The war being prosecuted against us is primarily institutional, not nationalist. <BR/><BR/>Sheep can be sorted from goats visually. How do you sort Mujahideen from their more passive brethren? What of those who contributed Zakat to the Holy Land Foundation for transmission to Hamas? They threw no bombs; discharged no fire arms, but they supported Jihad none the less. <BR/><BR/>Islam is predatory; mercenary & militant, not passive. I suggest reading Surah Al-Anfal & Surah Al-Taubah. Those Surahs are confirmed & exemplified by the Jihad & Expedition books of the four major hadith collections. <BR/><BR/>Those ayat & ahadith are confirmed by inclusion in Sharia, codified in Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9. <BR/><BR/>For those to indolent to peruse the translated documents, the most relevant ayat & ahadith together with the tafsir which explain their obvious meanings have been compiled, with a substantial quotation of Reliance O9, into an e-book which you can download, read and search. You can find it by searching for its name: EgregiousAyat.chm. Links are provided in the book for context & verification. <BR/><BR/>Allah commands his slaves to make war upon disbelievers; pagans and "people of the book". Moe said that the war would continue until Judgment Day. Muslims who refuse to participate when called to fight are condemned to Hellfire as hypocrites. Muslims not called to fight are obliged to finance the war and support the families of those who have joined the Jihad. <BR/><BR/>Jihad is carried out with the heart, tongue, pen & purse as well as the sword. <BR/><BR/>You can not determine, by sight or smell, whether any given Muslim is planning, plotting or preparing to engage in a violent, destructive act. Nor can you determine whether he supports, admires or respects those who are so engaged. Neither can you predict which presently passive Muslim will become radicalized in some future period. <BR/><BR/>"Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion nor prohibiting the free exercise of the same. ..." <BR/><BR/>The free exercise of Islam requires making war on Kuffar, killing them, raping their widows, selling their orphans into slavery and confiscating their real & personal property. Sane, able bodied, free adult male Muslims not thus engaged are in sin, and condemned to Hellfire. It is required that they attack at least once in every year. <BR/><BR/>The obligation is communal: fard kifaya unless Muslim land is invaded or insufficient manpower has been raised for a conquest, in which cases it becomes fard ayn. <BR/><BR/>Allah says "fight them", "fight those who"; "O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn "[8:39, 9:29, 9:123].<BR/><BR/>There is a conflict here. Does anyone perceive it? Congress is forbidden to prohibit the free exercise of religion. Islam requires actions which directly impair our rights to life,liberty, property and security. <BR/><BR/>Jihad can not be prohibited by law. A constitutional amendment is required to remove the umbrella of first amendment protection from Islam. <A HREF="http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0geu5qTNC5JlEcAzxdXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTBybnZlZnRlBHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMQRjb2xvA2FjMgR2dGlkAw--/SIG=138kkktkm/EXP=1227851283/**http%3a//pedestrianinfidel.blogspot.com/2007/02/proposed-constitutional-amendment.html" REL="nofollow">Amendment 28</A> has been proposed by Pedestrian Infidel. <BR/><BR/>An online petition in support of the proposed amendment has been posted. A blog post including the most significant arguments for the amendment has been posted <A HREF="http://snooper.wordpress.com/2007/12/31/outlaw-islam/" REL="nofollow">here. </A> Only 89 people have endorsed the petition. Few know about its existence. Links to other related petitions can be found at Crusader's Armory. <BR/><BR/>Registration of Muslims would accomplish little and is unconstitutional. You can no more register Muslims than Catholics or Mormons. You must amend the Constitution first. If you go to that trouble, you may as well go all the way and deport them all, at the same time prohibiting their entry. Only then will be secure from domestic attacks. There is no alternative. <BR/><BR/>If you will wait for Islam to reform; for the Qur'an to be edited, you will wait until Hell freezes over. The Qur'an is Allah's divine, perfected word which neither changes nor can be changed. <BR/>My flier "Can Islam be Reformed?" provides the details.Benhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01975775791961343435noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3503986435514614182.post-13018525032743721712008-11-25T20:44:00.000-08:002008-11-25T20:44:00.000-08:00Mat, I agree that the slow and more gradual way is...Mat, I agree that the slow and more gradual way is how it will probably happen, but I don't know if that's necessarily the best way. There is a time-pressure here. I was just reading in The Week Magazine (which is a mainstream publication with no history of fear-mongering) published an interesting statistic recently:<BR/><BR/>"About 250 thefts of nuclear material were reported around the world this year, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA chief Mohammed ElBaradei called the number of thefts 'disturbingly high' and said most of the material is never recovered."<BR/><BR/>We already know al Qaeda has actively been seeking nuclear weapons for years. <BR/><BR/>So the time urgency is what makes me hesitate to endorse the gradual method.<BR/><BR/>Of course, a proposal like that (registering all Muslims) would be extremely controversial, and organizations like CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood would attack it vehemently. But would a patriotic American Muslim be bothered by it?<BR/><BR/>If there was a new Scottish-American supremacist organization plotting to overthrow the U.S. government and I had to register because I am part Scottish, I don't think it would bother me. In fact, I would probably be glad to do it and glad the government was doing SOMETHING about it to protect the rights of all of us. Those rights, freedom of the press, human rights, equality, etc., would disappear without the government actively protecting them.<BR/><BR/>If there are any patriotic Muslims reading this, I would appreciate it if you weighed in on this issue here in the comments. Would you be offended to have to register? Bothered? Outraged? Or would it be okay with you? If so, why?Citizen Warriorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06265844262699107352noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3503986435514614182.post-59576654933406671412008-11-25T18:27:00.000-08:002008-11-25T18:27:00.000-08:00I would have to think more about the registration ...I would have to think more about the registration of all muslims - it is a big step with a big brush. I have read other suggestions such as registering mosques and monitoring them to ensure they are not preaching jihadist principals. Identifying islamic concessions and denying their implementation or consideration would be a required step as well.<BR/><BR/>We are not doing as good of a job denying islamic concessions and ensuring their principals are not preached. Is the koran a seditious document that should be treated as such? Perhaps restrictions should be put on the koran until it is changed to make it actually reflect what some call the religion of peace. I have not heard or seen this proposed yet. <BR/><BR/>The bottomline is registering all muslims seems, without further consideration, a big step. We need, first, to do the little things and perhaps then the broad brush would not need to come out.Mattyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13300568700899175763noreply@blogger.com